Brett Kavanaugh just got one warning that is bad news for his future

Brett Kavanaugh and the rest of the Supreme Court justices are facing a major decision.

But before they reach a ruling on this high-profile case, the justices received the shock of their lives.

That’s because Brett Kavanaugh just got one warning that is bad news for his future.

The Supreme Court agreed to hear a ruling on a case involving an obscure New York City law prohibiting transportation of firearms.

Court watchers agreed the justices took the case because they wanted to establish that the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms extends outside the home.

Rhode Island Democrat Senator Sheldon Whitehouse filed a brief arguing the court should leave the anti-gun law in place.

Whitehouse warned that if the Supreme Court expanded gun rights, Democrats would pack the court with additional liberal justices to make sure conservatives never won another case again.

The Daily Caller reports:

Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island filed a legal brief before the Supreme Court in a challenge to New York City’s gun transportation regulations, advancing a broad indictment of the Roberts Court itself as he urged the justices to turn away the NRA-backed case.

The brief, which follows back-to-back mass shootings in El Paso, Texas and Dayton, Ohio, accuses the justices of delivering partisan decisions for monied Republican interests while warning of lasting damage to the Supreme Court’s legitimacy.

“The Supreme Court is not well. And the people know it. Perhaps the Court can heal itself before the public demands it be ‘restructured in order to reduce the influence of politics,’” Whitehouse wrote, alluding to court-packing measures that have gained traction in progressive circles. “Particularly on the urgent issue of gun control, a nation desperately needs it to heal.”

The case pertains to an ordinance, since amended, regulating gun transportation in New York City. The ordinance authorized licensed gun owners to carry firearms to and from gun ranges, and forbade the removal of firearms from city limits. The plaintiffs are city residents who wish to transport their firearms to vacation homes for self-defense and to shooting competitions outside the five boroughs.

This brief is aimed at Chief Justice John Roberts.

Roberts is an institutionalist who cares about what the liberal media writes about the court’s reputation.

Whitehouse is trying to bully Roberts into voting with the four liberal justices to support gun control and prevent Democrats from going nuclear on the Supreme Court.

Loading...

You may also like...

74 Responses

  1. AlfromFl says:

    If dems get in the W/H, they will try to “fundamentally transform” America – watching the 2020 crowd, it looks like they will turn the U.S. into a Venezuela. Packing the court is neither new nor achievable if the repubs stay in power but it does confirm what the dems consider the court’s role – they believe it should legislate from the bench according to the tenets of the democrat party. Another indication that the dems no longer embrace nor are a part of traditional America.

  2. John Galt says:

    Roosevelt tried to pack the Supreme Court and failed. Neither side is going to be allowed to do that.

  3. Gregory Sullivan says:

    Vasu:
    Why don’t you move to a country where firearms are prohibited ie Japan where a man beat his family to death with a shovel and maybe we should outlaw shovels as well and hopefully a member of your family will do the same to you. As far as I’m concerned, if that happens, good riddance.

  4. tracy says:

    I have read many of your responses. people saying we must be Christians, and then make racist comments, very uneducated folks out there. just think about what you are saying. the hate has to stop. one way streets are just that. they go one way only. try having a good solid conversation with anybody on the dems side and you get nothing but hands in your face. stick together republicans, dems will bring this great usa down if they get there way.

  5. Hey Little Whitehouse, remember you REAP what you SOW.
    That being said, you’re a COMMUNIST Piece of Excrement, that’s just another NESTING COCKROACH using tax payers money.

  6. John Vetter says:

    Why do you not accept my e-mail?? I have had the same one for over twenty years??????.

    JV

  7. Bill says:

    We can made that Rhode Island Senator look like the fool he acts like by re-electing President Trump and a Republican majority to Congress in 2020. Get out and vote, people. Lip service won’t do it. To be counted you actually have to cast a ballot.

  8. Debbie says:

    Sheldon Whitehouse just threatened the Supreme Court. Wants to control their votes.

    • SweetOlBob says:

      Kavanaugh was appointed to the Supreme Court because he said he would follow the constitution of the United States.
      That includes not being influenced by some idle threats from some democRAT . What is different between what she threatened and what the little muslim fraud, obama* did ?
      Of course the democRATS will try to pack the court with bed wetting, rule-from-the-bench Liberal, sop judges.
      That’s no threat, that’s a statement of fact.

      • Pete Moss says:

        Agreed.

      • chief1937 says:

        I agree democrats would pack the court with liberals if possible however that threat should not influence the way our court now rules using the constitution as their guide if they do that then simply they can’t go wrong it is when they get away from it they get in trouble. Stick to the constitution and be safe.

      • Roger D Mann says:

        Maybe they should be in control before they say what they might do, at the moment all they can do is talk!

        • Will T says:

          So let them talk and tell everyone their plans. The more people hear their insanity, the less likely that they will ever be voted back into control.
          I think that we are witnessing the implosion of the party. By the time Trump finishes his second term, the mental institutions will be overloaded with former Democrats.

  9. Karl Stecher says:

    Sheldon Whitehouse has shown his partisanship and dishonesty multiple times.
    In Tom Price’s hearing for Cabinet HHS, Whitehouse fairly demanded of Dr. Price that he confirm that global warming was “settled science.” (I was present).
    In the Kavanaugh hearings, Blasey Ford said there were perhaps a total of three people present at the party of which she had little memory…they were close friends of Kavanaugh. Whitehouse scoured Judge Kavanaugh’s diary and found a party with about 14 named people present…which included those three. Whitehouse then insisted that that was the party Blasey Ford was talking about…the one with three people present…in the effort by Whitehouse to discredit a well qualified judge.
    So Whitehouse will do most anything to push his leftist agenda.

    • Bob says:

      Whitehorse is only one person and a Democrat at that. Right now the Senate has a majority of Senators from the Republican Party. So all he is doing is blowing smoke. If I were a member of the Supreme Court, I would vote with my conscious and the 2nd Amendment. There has to be a law against Senators blackmailing the Supreme Court to rule in their favor. Maybe Chief Justice Roberts needs to Exercise his authority and vote with the Conservative Justices to show Whitehorse’s A– that the court can not be intimidated by anyone. Do I expect this to happen – No, because Obama intimidated Roberts some years ago and Roberts changed his mind on ACA (ObamaCare). Roberts re-wrote the law to make the mandate a tax instead of a penalty as the Democrat author intended it to be. This was clearly a violation of Roberts’ oath of office.

  10. Bob says:

    If the situation were reversed and it was Republicans threatening to pack the court to support any number of conservative issues, the media would be screaming bloody murder about how this is unconstitutional, unAmerican and not morally right. But seeing as it reflects the MSM view, its okay for the left to do this.

  11. Big Ed says:

    The last time there was a discussion about packing the Supreme Court was when FDR was president and he wanted to pack the court because they kept saying many of his desired laws were unconstitutional. He said he would just expand the Court with as many judges as needed to make his crappy laws constitutional. At that time, it was the Democrats in Congress who stopped him from doing it, but this was when Democrats were still people who loved the country. That ship has now sailed and what’s good for the country no longer matters to Democrats. I guess if Whitehouse wants to threaten the people with court packing, the people will have to threaten him with a civil war and strong retribution for people who are willing to destroy Constitutional government for a bit of immediate power.

    • SweetOlBob says:

      Big Ed:
      That ship hasn’t sailed, it was scuttled by the power hungry, anti-Americans we have in Congress today who call themselves democRATS. Under their current leadership, they have even allayed themselves with sworn enemies of our country in order to fight and obstruct PRESIDENT TRUMP.
      note: I always inscribe “PRESIDENT TRUMP” because it makes the liberal, election fixing, (they thought) democRATs grind the enamel off their teeth when they read it.
      Like the old Jewish wish: May all their teeth fall out but one, so they could still have a toothache !

  12. Sweden has made ownership of guns by its people MANDATORY!
    They teach gun shooting and safety to kids starting at 10 years old.
    They have the LOWEST incidence of murders in the world!

    • Rod says:

      This isn’t right, it isn’t mandatory to own a gun in Sweden. They may teach shooting and safety at a young age, hunting is popular.
      They do not have the lowest incidence of murder either, although it is low.
      Sweden does have a relatively high rate of gun ownership, however every gun requires a separate license and there must be a legitimate reason to own it, and self defence is only legitimate by court order. So very different to America when you compare all items, not just cherry pick and make up fake news.

  13. Proud vet says:

    Like the communist a.k.a. Democrat party would quit stuffing scumbags like their selves in these judge ships that have intervened in trump like the communist a.k.a. Democrat party would quit stuffing scumbags like their selves in these judge ships that Injected there’s selves instead of the rule of law into trumps moves to keep America safe from invasion of those should come here to steal we the American people blind well the communist a.k.a. Democrat once again hide behind race to shut us up and that ain’t going to happen!

    • Statesman Patriot says:

      1) We need Teump re-elected and the Senate remain in Rwpublican control.
      2) We need Justice Ginsberg to retire very very soon
      3) We need her seat to be filled by a good conservative.
      4) If any conservative justices noted on retiring, they need to do so while Trump is in office and the senate is in republican control.
      5) Trump and we constitutionalists need to be very leery of Justice Roberts who seems to check the wind rather than the constitution.
      6) We all need to be prepared for the civil war that we do not want but the left is working so hard to start!

  14. Julie says:

    it is time for the Great Silent majority to stand up and be counted, again!

  15. JJ Johnson-Smith says:

    Get rid of Liberal, Activist Judges NOW, before they get the chance. ANY Judge that violates our Constitution MUST be removed at the insistence of the PEOPLE.

    • James A Langham says:

      STOP THE RACIST HATEFUL UNCHRISTIAN REPUBLICANS.

      • Mysty says:

        Who’s hateful???? The ONLY people who spread hate across this nation are YOU DEMOCRATS!! YOU DO NOT HEAR WORDS OF HATE. COMING FROM OUR GREAT PRESIDENT TRUMP or any of the Republicans in office…ONLY DEMOCRATS.
        Why don’t you quit being anal retentive & look at the truth.

      • USCitizen says:

        Keep drinking the cool-aid. Excellent way of making yourself irrelevant.

      • Statesman Patriot says:

        You’re one of those self anointed idiots aren’t you?
        All the racism started with YOUR Obama and all the violence that is coming from you lefties is a result of Obama and centuries of racism.
        History disproves your lying narrative.

  16. Just remember what the Japanese were about to do in invading the US after Pearl Harbor. The fact is that behind every blade of grass a gun barrel would have been pointed at them if they came to our shores. I never like the idea of eating my meals with chop sticks or not eating at all. Better to have had a few gun accidents than to be enslaved by a foreign power. The hell with liberals and their BS. Long live the 2nds amendment!

  17. Lin says:

    So how are the democrats going to do that if the senate has the majority? Or are we talking state level?

  18. John Decker says:

    So now the Democrat party is issuing threats to the Supreme Court. What will they do? Will they have an Anti-fa mob take over the courtroom and beat the Justices with clubs and pipes? Chief Justice Roberts needs to step on the Dems with both feet and show the Left that the Supreme Court is called Supreme for a reason. Maybe a few weeks in solitary confinement for contempt of court will teach the Left some manners. If they’re capable of learning.

  19. David Muench says:

    These Democrats should stay the he’ll out of the supreme courts cases and business and the court should not allow outside influences to rule their decisions.

  20. Charles says:

    Oh. Bull. The Democrats are going to pack the SC with liberal justices anytime they get the chance, and this case is not going to make any difference. Don’t yall have anything better to write about?

    • Bob says:

      You are correct. The thing that frosts my butt is the freaking RINOs always vote to put liberal justices on the court and will not fight for a conservative. The exception being the last one (Kavanaugh). RINO Lindsey Graham surprised me to no end by fighting to get him through the Senate. The woman (Blasey Ford) was a Democrat activist who made up a bunch of lies about a sexual assault that supposedly happened when they were teenagers to try and stop Kavanaugh, but this did not work this time largely due to RINO Graham. Now Graham has collaborated with that liar from Connecticut Richard (Da Nang) Blumenthal to try and get a “Red Flag and gun control” law passed. We are not fooled this time “Amnesty” Lindsey Graham. We know you miss that weasel John McCain, but we do not because he was a traitor with his “thumbs down” crap with Chucky Schumer to keep ACA (ObamaCare) from being repealed.

  21. gls says:

    Since when is it legal for these democrats to threaten everyone and now the SCOTUS! Just who the hell do they think they are….they are the most vile and evil pos in the swamp. We are so tired of their threats, just bring it on and see who wins.

  22. Vasu Murti says:

    Gun violence IS a sanctity-of-life issue!

    A gun in one’s home is 22 times more likely to be used to kill or injure in a criminal assault or homicide, an attempted or completed suicide, or unintentional shooting than to kill or injure in self-defense. (Kellermann, et al, 1998 Journal of Trauma, 42:263-67)

    In the U.S., 8 children and teenagers are killed, and more than 47 are injured, by a firearm every day. (CDC, NCHS, December 2006)

    The risk of homicide in the home is three times greater in households with guns. (Kellermann, et al, New England Journal of Medicine, 1993)

    The risk of suicide is five times greater in households with guns. (Kellermann et al, New England Journal of Medicine, 1992)

    A 1990 law banning the sale of “Saturday Night Special” handguns in Maryland was associated with reduced use of these guns by criminals, and a 9% lower rate of firearm homicides in the state between 1990-1998 than would have been expected had there been no law.

    Policies that deny handgun purchases to individuals with prior misdemeanor or felony convictions are associated with a decreased risk of subsequent convictions. Misdemeanants who had allowed to purchase handguns prior to the passage of a California state law prohibiting such purchases had a rate of criminal offending 29% higher than that among misdemeanants who were denied handgun purchases after the law took effect.

    Every day in the U.S., 8 children and teenagers are killed and more than 47 are injured by a firearm.

    In 2005, 595 California children and youth under age 21 were killed with firearms and 1,554 California children and youth under 21 were hospitalized with nonfatal firerarms injuries.

    One-third of U.S. children live in homes with firearms. Almost half of homes with children and firearms keep a gun unlocked.

    68% of the attackers in school shootings obtained the gun(s) from their own home or that of a relative. 61% of the attackers used handguns.

    Many young children, including children as young as three years old, are strong enough to fire a handgun.

    In 2004, guns were used to kill:

    5 people in New Zealand
    37 in Sweden
    56 in Australia
    73 in England and Wales
    184 in Canada

    and 11,344 in the United States. God bless America.

    Gun control advocate Junling Hu writes:

    “A gun is a consumer product, sold for cash and purchased by individuals. While all other consumer products including teddy bears are subject to strict federal laws, guns are given a free pass. There are no safety regulation on guns thanks to the NRA’s lobbying efforts. Unsafe guns lead to accidents and death of adults and children at home. The ones who suffer are the gun owners.

    “A gun is also a lethal weapon. Falling into the wrong hand, it enables a criminal to kill, a gang member to fight, and a teenager to seek revenge. Guns are deadlier than tobacco, alcohol or gambling combined. While all of these are off limits to youngsters, and although a 20-year-old can be arrested for drinking a beer, he can go scot-free for buying a gun.

    “The debate over gun laws is muffled by the slogan, ‘We need less government regulation.’ It is as if government regulation is always wrong. These people ignore the fact that the government regulates every aspect of our life today. From water to air, to drugs and toys, everything touching us is regulated by law. Without the Clean Air Act, we would be breathing dirty air emissions from power plants; we would be drinking unsafe water. Without government regulation, medicines with fatal side effects would not be pulled off shelves and toys with lead poison would still be on the market. Government regulation affects our housing safety, our food quality, our driving safety (through speed limits and safety belt laws). As we live in a civilized society, the government serves as a mediator and enforcer as no individual can do.

    “The freedom of owning a gun has virtually nothing to do with abiding gun laws. Anyone can own an automobile, but they still need to register and get licenses for their cars. Everyone has the freedom of owning a house, but they still have to watch for zoning regulation and fire safety requirements.

    “Sensible gun laws govern manufacturing standard, product safety, and accessible by minors and criminals. Sensible gun laws govern the safety of our street, our school, and most importantly, the safety of our home.

    “Common sense gun laws such as closing gun show loophole, assault weapon ban, and child-lock are fundamentally needed to be sure guns do not fall into wrong hands. Yet all these basic laws are fought against by the NRA lobby. How far can we go in this extremist view of so-called ‘individual freedom’? The consequence of suffering is demonstrated by deadly shooting every day, in every corner of America. Each day, over 80 people die from gun shooting, from accidents at home, to disputes with one’s neighbor, to random shootings on the street. The deadly consequence of ‘gun freedom’ are the death of a young four-year-old–shot while playing with guns, a 15-year-old while in heat of argument, and a 19-year-old walking out of a nightclub.

    “America does not have to be a society soaked in blood, because the bloody consequences were caused by a powerful gun lobby that stripped away our basic protection from the law. Let’s work to enact sensible gun laws. We ask for sensible regulation on guns, as we ask for regulation on food and drugs. The gun issue is no longer a private matter but a public safety issue. It affects all of us. Let’s pass sensible gun laws now.”

    The logic of gun control can best be understood by considering the analogy of the automobile. A car is a potentially lethal weapon. To drive a car, one must be trained, licensed, and have that license periodically renewed. And a car is designed solely as a means of transportation. Guns, on the other hand, are deliberately designed to kill people. It is not unreasonable to demand their regulation.

    Guns are the second deadliest consumer product (after cars) on the market. By the end of the 1990s, firearms will likely supplant automobiles as the leading cause of product-related deaths throughout the United States. In 1990, American guns claimed an estimated 37,000 lives. There are no federal safety standards for the domestic manufacture of guns. There are no voluntary, industry-wide safety standards for the manufacture of guns.

    Every two minutes, somebody somewhere in the United States is shot. Every 14 minutes, somebody dies from a gunshot wound. Each gun injury involving hospitalization costs $33,159. A license to sell a gun costs 83 cents per month.

    A gun rolls off the assembly line in America every 10 seconds. America imports another gun every 11 seconds. There are 246,984 gun dealers in the United States, but only 240 inspectors to keep an eye on them.

    There is a popular myth that handgun ownership makes people safer. In reality, the New England Journal of Medicine reports that a handgun in the home is 43 times more likely to kill the owner, a family member, or a friend than it is to kill an intruder. Over 75 percent of firearm deaths in a typical year involve handguns. The FBI Uniform Crime Statistics Report says that nationally, there were 38,317 firearm deaths in 1992, but fewer than 300 justifiable homicides.

    Another myth is that gun control laws don t make a difference. In reality, strict handgun regulation saves lives. In Washington, DC, a tougher gun law actually reduced homicides by 25 percent through the mid-1980s. Again, the New England Journal of Medicine reports that 47 lives were saved in Washington, DC, in a typical year studied, because of that city’s handgun ban.

    Most other industrialized nations have virtual bans on handgun sales. In 1990, handguns were used in the homicides of 13 people in Sweden, 91 in Switzerland, 87 in Japan, 22 in Great Britain, and 68 in Canada, compared to 10,567 in the United States.

    Is gun control constitutional? The Second Amendment refers to “the right of the people to keep and bear arms.” Roger Tatarian, professor emeritus of journalism at California State University, Fresno, notes, however, that “things can change over time” with regards to the original intent of the founders.

    The Third Amendment, for example, protects citizens against compulsory quartering of troops in private homes. Technology has also made obsolete the constitutional provision giving Congress the right to declare war. “No president who is warned that a hostile missile is en route…has time nowadays to ask Congress for a declaration of war before responding,” states Tartarian. “He can commit the country to an all-out war simply by pressing a button.”

    Tartarian observes: “The Constitution certainly does not ban private ownership of weapons; that would have been unthinkable for a people still living in an often hostile natural environment and where many depended on hunting for a livelihood. But a tradition of owning arms is one thing and a constitutional guarantee is quite another. They ought not be confused

    According to Tatarian: “The Second Amendment as it now exists evolved from a draft offered by James Madison on June 8, 1789. His intent very clearly was to tie the constitutional right to own arms to service in official militias regulated by state governments.” Madison’s original proposal reads:

    “The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; a well armed and well regulated militia being the best security of a free country: but no person religiously scrupulous of bearing arms shall be compelled to render military service in person.”

    The final version of the amendment which emerged from a House-Senate conference on September 25, 1789, also tied the constitutional right to bear arms to service in a militia, and stated that such militias are to be “well regulated”:

    “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

    Handgun control is constitutional. The courts have repeatedly ruled that the Second Amendment does not apply to individuals outside the context of “a well regulated militia.” A handgun control ordinance was upheld by the U.S. Seventh Court of Appeals in 1982, which issued the following statement: “We conclude that the right to keep and bear handguns is not guaranteed by the Second Amendment.”

    The Supreme Court let the decision stand by refusing to hear the appeal of the handgun lobby. The Supreme Court ruled in United States v. Cruikshank that the Second Amendment doesn’t mean anything except “(the right to keep and bear arms) shall not be infringed by Congress.”

    This 1876 ruling established that states and localities are not prevented from enacting their own gun control laws–and they remain free to do so to this day. In 1980, the Supreme Court reconfirmed that “these legislative restrictions on the use of firearms do not trench upon any constitutionally protected liberties.”

    Guns should be regulated like other consumer products. Handguns and assault rifles should be banned, and ammunition should be taxed heavily.

    The Democratic Party platform should support: Animal Rights, Defending the Affordable Care Act, Ending Citizens United, Ending Marijuana Prohibition, Giving Greater Visibility to Pro-Life Democrats, Gun Control, Net Neutrality, Raising the Minimum Wage to $15 an Hour, Responding to the Scientific Consensus on Global Warming, and a Sustainable Energy Policy.

    Democrats for Life of America, 10521 Judicial Drive, #200, Fairfax, VA 22030, (703) 424-6663

    • Charles says:

      Ok, Vasu Murti, (what kind of name is THAT?) We get it, You don’t like the 2nd Amendment. We do. I suggest you move to somewhere where the firearms laws are to your liking, because we are not changing it. What does need to happen, is firearm safety and marksmanship, needs to be part of the curriculum, in every high school across the nation. This will end most of the accidents, but not all of them.

    • Inkpad says:

      Omg what a liberal snowflake you show yourself to be you really have no clue do you

    • Will T says:

      Vasu, why do you keep coming on here with your overly long-winded bunch of BS and your Democrats to Suck the Life Out of America that you keep spamming? Why keep wasting your time and ours? Do you somehow not understand that nobody here wants to hear it, or even bothers to read your posts, that you are just an annoyance? Why not take it to a Democrat site where it might be more appreciated?

    • Inkpad says:

      Omg what a liberal snowflake you show yourself to be you really have no clue do you ?

    • Hurley Henson says:

      Vasu is the biggest raghead fool that has ever walked or breathed.

    • Bill says:

      I read the other day that the medical system, be accident, kills over twenty times more of us than guns. Based on our population gun related deaths of all kinds is .0000079% of our population. Sad that there are any gun deaths. But by these statistics we’d be better off banning doctors. That too would be ridiculous.

    • mlhtd51 says:

      You Demonrats and Your “GUN FREE ZONES” FACT, 98% of Public Mass Shootings occur in “GUN-FREE ZONES”. The other 2% occur in areas that were immediately Adjacent To “GUN-FREE Zones” (such as Parking Lots or Streets) Vasu Murti, If You DO NOT Like The USA, You Are FREE To Leave To Another Country That Suits Your Lifestyle.

    • John W Bletsch says:

      Let’s talk about who is really killing children. Over 900K children are killed in legalized abortions. If you support killing babies you have no .oral ground to stand on decrying my constitution right to keep and bear arms. Where do the vast majority of firearms related deaths occur? They occur in Democrat cities such as Chicago, Baltimore, New Orleans, NYC, who have the harshest gun laws and 92% of mass shootings by leftists occur in gun free zones such as those in the last two mass murders by unhinged leftists who were registered Democrats.

    • Julie says:

      who the hell are you and what rock are you living under? When owning a gun is criminal only criminals will have guns.
      Stop and think you moron. when the wadge for basic low poorly trained workers goes up 15 dollars an hour they won’t be technical WON’T BE GETTING ANY MORE money because the price of living will naturally adjust and create a vacuum of higher prices.

      The democrats just need to set down and shut up. They are not helping average people.

      Do you REally think Obama care worked? we all saw our insurance rate rase as much as 500%.

      Take it and your self to another country.
      What kind of fool are you?

      If you don’t like America and what it’s founding fathers set up go BACK to where ever you came from, and take your bull*** reteric with you!

    • SweetOlBob says:

      Vasu: (what the hell is a Vasu ?)
      Los of really good statistics. I especiall like he one about “teenagers killed by guns”. By any chance does that include the victims of drug and gang violence such as found in Chicago ?
      All the other stats are accumulations of all gun injuries, uch as accidents, hunting, and everything else, gathered together by anti gun nuts like yourself to assume large proportions.
      Now lets see you quote some figures on violence and possible murder prevented by the use of a gun for protection. Even in instances where the gun is never fired.
      Say what ?? I can’t hear you !

    • Bob says:

      With a name like Vasu Murti, you must be from a foreign country (maybe Turkey or some Arab country) because your long winded bunch of lies did not resonate with me. We need to strengthen the 2nd Amendment; not weaken it.

    • Thomas says:

      Infringement is still infringement liberty isn’t free.Japan sounds like the place for you.

  23. Johnny says:

    Face it! Democrats just plain suck!

  24. Larry says:

    The Supreme Court is not a Roberts Court even though Roberts has sided with Democrats and Liberals. Roberts needs to step down as he can not be trusted to make a fair and honest judgement any longer. I bet Clinton owns him now

  25. Lola says:

    Misleading title and article – – just what does this directly have to do with Kavanaugh 😕 You want him to start drinking heavily again and commit acts of violence????

  26. Joe Know says:

    It sounds like the liberals are trying to blackmail the supreme court and should be charged with the crime. Lock all those involved up & throw away the key.

    • Candice says:

      I totally agree with Joe. This is blackmail!! Just goes to show you the depths some people will go to to get what they want. ):

  27. Bill says:

    Every last demorat in the House AND the Senate needs to be ARRESTED and charged with appropriate crimes!!!

  28. Bob. says:

    The Democratic party should be labeled a hate group in America. There is not one Dem that I would stop and protect during a crime against them. Now the Mexicans are demanding better conditions and to be released in72 hours after being detained. If they do not like it here, go home you roaches. Now today the Tribal Princess says she will stop manufacturing ammo for assault rifles, no problem since I saw this coming. I reload and have 20,000 rounds so my friends can continue to enjoy our sport. Warrior Princess can kiss my ass !

  29. Mark N. says:

    The brief is not suggesting that the Court leave the ordinance in place–NYC and NYS have already changed the law, and are now arguing that the lawsuit is moot, in an attempt to avoid Supreme Court review of the “to bear” clause in the Second Amendment. Essentially the same thing happened when the DC Circuit forced DC into “shall issue” for CCWs; in order to avoid a potentially damaging (to them) Supreme Court case whether there is a right to a concealed weapons permit where open carry is banned, NY and CA persuaded DC not to appeal to the Supreme Court. The gun banners are terrified that with four solidly conservative justices (we think, although Gorsuch is ambiguous) an a generally conservative Roberts, gun control efforts would be undermined for at least a generation if not longer.

  30. glock19fan says:

    Franklin Roosevelt tried to do that, wanting to change the court size from nine to fifteen. I don’t remember the details because I was a kid at the time.

  31. John Raffa says:

    The democrats try for a dream world.

  32. Peggy says:

    Frankly the US Constitution has no restrictions on gun transportation to and from anywhere. Read the Bill of Rights. There’s nothing ambiguous that would forbid transporting firearms. Democrats continue to attack the Bill of Rights on lawsuit after another.

    • Jersey Prophet says:

      New Jersey apparently hasn’t read the Bill of Rights. This radical state absolutely prohibits transportation of firearms in your car unless you are going to or coming from a gun store or shooting range and can prove it. Once I had to fly from Texas to NJ with permission from the airline to carry a firearm in my checked baggage. As soon as I claimed my baggage at the airport I became a criminal. Had a police officer chosen to check my car and found the firearm, I’d have become an instant jailbird.

      What gives with this state-by-state arbitrary set of gun laws? It is high time all laws affecting travelers be made uniform across the states. One can’t become an automatic criminal just by crossing a state line!

  33. Joyce Garvin says:

    Go ahead, make my day! Remember those words, dems better stop intimidating anyone who disagrees. President Trump will probably get one more pick at SCOTUS!!! That would drive the dems over the cliff.@%&**>%!]]$?*#-=:-)

  34. Will T says:

    Hey Whitehouse, fuggetaboutit! With Trump getting reelected, Republicans maintaining control of the Senate and regaining control of the House, you Marxists will not packing anything more than ‘fudge’ or pushing anything for years to come.

  35. James Howard says:

    The psychological age of these Leftists is about 7.
    They are narcistic-psychos.
    The are bullies & terrorists.
    There is no reasoning with them.
    They do not relent in their insanity.
    Like a wild animal I’m a constant seething rage.
    Conservative manual for converting leftist brain-fog cases.

    TIPPING POINTS: How to Topple the Lefts House of Cards. LIZ WHEELER of OAN.

    JIHADIST PSYCHOPATH: How He is Charming, Seducing & Devouring Us. JAMIE GLAZOV.

  36. Pat says:

    Are you the law of the land whitehouse , if you think you are all the people of the US. Your delusional. THE PEOPLE will never let you pack the supreme Court. Democrats and Republicans. Don’t fool yourself .

    • Truckman says:

      whitehouse is as crazy cortez if he thinks that they have to get a democrap in office first and what the Republations all of us is shut the mass media down until they start reporting the real news not the democraps version I have done quit most of it and am going to start writing there sponsors if enough of us do that we can change it

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: