This court ruling just became the biggest threat to gun rights since Obama was in office

President Trump may be in the White House, but that doesn’t mean gun-grabbers have given up chipping away at the Second Amendment.

And they may have just received an upper hand.

This court ruling could effectively destroy the Second Amendment overnight.

Liberals have realized they can’t outright ban guns.

Which is why they have turned to creative gun-confiscation schemes such as the so-called “assault weapons” ban or “mental health background checks.”

Traditionally, the courts have not sided with gun-control activists and have upheld the Second Amendment.

But all of that just changed.

The Connecticut Supreme Court has ruled that the victims of a mass shooting may sue the firearms manufacturer for liability.

Breitbart reports:

The Connecticut Supreme Court ruled 4-3 that the suit against the manufacturer of the stolen AR-15 used in the Sandy Hook shooting can proceed.

The attacker in the December 14, 2012, shooting took the Bushmaster rifle from his mother, killed her, then took the AR-15 and other stolen guns to school and killed 26 others.

The suit is against Remington, which is the parent company of Bushmaster, and it was filed in October 2014. It was dismissed two years later, in October 2016, by Connecticut Superior Court Judge Barbara Bellis.

Bellis dismissed the case in light of the 2005 Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), which protects gun manufacturers from being sued in instances where the gun in question was legally made and sold. The Bushmaster was legally made and sold to Nancy Lanza, prior to it being stolen and used in a crime.

If gun manufacturers are held responsible for the acts of criminals, they may be forced to close their doors.

That could make access to firearms for law-abiding citizens nearly impossible in the future.

Leftists are trying to do everything in their power to get rid of all firearms.

But you won’t see them blaming car manufacturers for a radical Islamic terrorist plowing through a crowd of people.

If the gun-grabbers get their way and this ruling holds up, the Second Amendment could be in grave danger.

What do you think? Vote in our poll and let us know in the comments section.

You may also like...

107 Responses

  1. ward says:

    REMEMBER world history that dictators have to remove any threat to their tyranny rule & guns or any weapon has to be removed from the hands of all people that want freedom & Rights ! Remove the dictator supporting stench of bo type dem asses from government to support U.S. Citizen Constitution !

  2. NOBODY says:

    ok, let’s think about this for a NY min.
    if this is the case, then human error air crashes should sue the manufactures of planes, and the morons that drive their cars/trucks in to crowds those manufactures should oh, hell lets sue the government for granting all those lic. to manufacture the cars, trucks, guns and explosive markers, plane and the government! oh, wait the pressure cookers co. as well, why stop there, same goes for items that only may cause cancer.
    ()MAY)
    these idiots want us sterilized bare foot, dumb down, SO THE DEEP STATE can control us…. soilet and green anyone? rino’s get out! your not wanted here

  3. UBenHad says:

    It IS A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT THAT ALLOWS AMERICANS TO OBTAIN AND OWN A GUN!!!IF you read the 2nd ammendment,NOWHERE in that wording does it say that certain AMERICANS would be denied their 2nd AMENDMENT rights by being forced to undergo a background check TO BE ENTITLED TO OBTAIN AND OWN A FIREARM AS THE 2ND AMMENDMENT CLEARLY STATES THAT THIS RIGHT “SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED UPON!”…SO,WITH THIS SAID,IF WE WANT TO GET TO SPLITTING HAIRS HERE …THIS BACKGROUND CHECK USURPS THE 2ND AMMENDMENT WHEN THE 2ND AMMENDMENT CLEARLY STATES THAT THIS RIGHT SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED UPON!…IT CANNOT LEGALLY BE ANY MORE CLEARLY WRITTEN AS TO ITS MEANING AS ONCE THE SUPREME COURT ALLOWS EVEN THE SLIGHTEST ALTERATION OF THE 2ND AMMENDMENT THEN THIS MEANS THAT THOSE WHO ARE BEHIND THE CHANGE TO THE 2ND AMMENDMENT CLEARLY HAS ULTERIOR MOTIVES FOR THE BASIS OF THIS AMMENDMENT TO BE ALTERED…AND ITS NOT FOR THE PEOPLE ….ITS FOR THE FEW WHO DESIRE THE POWER AND CONTROL OVER THE PEOPLE!! SAME REASON WHY THESE SAME PEOPLE ARE TRYING TO WORK AROUND THE 1ST AMMENDMENT

  4. Mike says:

    So if arms manufacturers are responsible for deaths by firearms, are auto manufacturers going to be held responsible for deaths from auto accidents??

  5. Phil says:

    I surely hope so! This kind of ruling would spread to the States like wild fire for these gun grabbing fool’s! I know you are right! But. This battle will end up in court by individuals fighting for their Constitutional right’s just to make it s pain in our asses! To cause us grief to get our toy’s back? It ‘s a money making racket. The Democratic States think they have sovereignty to do or be in control of their State? Which you described is correct! If there is any discrepancies between any City , County , State or federal law? Federal law supersedes all other laws period!

  6. Phil says:

    This is totally insane! So next they’ll be suing a rope manufacturer because someone strangled someone else with a rope? Or a car or truck was used to kill someone after it was stolen? To kill some innocent person walking in a crosswalk? So sue the manufacturer too! What idiot would create this type of law? Manufacturing would grind to a halt and no one would want to invent anything because they’re be in fear of being sued for misuse by a nut case who stole their product to kill someone on purpose or by accident? This type of garbage is what is destroying America! Talk about frivolous law suits?

  7. Gene says:

    In this instance, Federal Law holds supreme over the state’s ruling. This is a Constitutional issue that is covered by 15 U.S.C. §§ 7901-7903; Protection of Lawful Commerce Act. Their unlawful ruling will be overturned by the SCOTUS.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: