Mark Levin said six words to John Roberts that will stop you dead in your tracks

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts wants a fight with President Trump.

Roberts is edging the country closer to a constitutional crisis

And Mark Levin said six words to John Roberts that will stop you dead in your tracks.

President Trump called for the impeachment of rogue judges like Obama-appointed activist James Boasberg after Boasberg and his cabal of leftist judicial tyrants began issuing orders naming themselves the Secretary of State, Defense, and Homeland Security among others so they could not just block President Trump’s agenda but order him to carry out Joe Biden and Kamala Harris’ policies.

Roberts didn’t respond by marshalling the Supreme Court to issue a ruling ending the lawless practice of local judges issuing nationwide injunctions.

Instead, Roberts took Trump to task for standing up for the Constitution and defending America from what amounted to a judicial monarchy.

“For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose,” a press release from Roberts to the pro-Democrat Party media stated.

Fox News host Martha MacCallum asked talk show host Mark Levin what he made of Roberts supporting the idea that the left-wing district court judges are more powerful than the President.

“600 and some judges at this level, you know, in terms of the Supreme Court, if it’s as egregious as you say, what would you expect to hear from them? We know yesterday, Justice Roberts weighed in, really on behalf of the judge’s right to say this, and the process is going to play out,” MacCallum inquired.

Levin questioned Roberts’ manhood and declared Roberts needed to realize “it’s time to grow a pair.”

“I would say that John Roberts, who I knew before he was a judge, when we both worked in the Reagan administration, it’s time to grow a pair, judge,” Levin exclaimed.

Levin worked with Roberts in the Reagan administration and said former Chief Justice William Rehnquist – whom Roberts clerked for – would be appalled at a cabal of left-wing authoritarians asserting the idea that the President of the United States reports to a local magistrate.

“Think about Justice Rehnquist. What would Justice Rehnquist, the Chief Justice, have done when those four originalists two weeks ago when this case involving another rogue Democrat judge ordered the President of the United States to spend money on foreign activities. What would Rehnquist have done? Would he have joined the four or would he have joined the radical three?” Levin exclaimed.

Levin told MacCallum this was a simple issue of separation of powers where Boasberg and his fellow tyrants want to destroy the idea of a co-equal branches of government by installing themselves as mini dictators through judicial fiat.

“This is an issue of separation of powers and if it’s not resolved, you basically in the form of your question have answered it. How the hell are we going to have 680 individual, unelected federal judges, they’re federal district judges, not federal national judges, all sitting there behind their desks with two or three clerks saying, you know, I don’t like this idea– Trump’s sending this. I don’t like this idea of banning transgender. I don’t like this idea. This is exactly what Locke and Montesquieu and Jefferson, and Madison warned,” Levin concluded.