You won’t believe which Supreme Court Justice is about to get fired

The Supreme Court has a role to play in the impeachment hoax.

One Justice overstepped their authority.

And you won’t believe which Supreme Court Justice is about to get fired.

For the second day in a row Kentucky Senator Rand Paul submitted a question to both the President’s lawyers and the House Impeachment Managers asking if they knew about Obama holdovers on the National Security Council Eric Ciaramella and Shawn Misko discussing impeaching President Trump back in 2017.

Misko now works for Adam Schiff on the House Intelligence Committee and many in Washington, D.C. believe that Ciaramella is the alleged whistleblower.

Senator Paul’s questions read:

To the Manager Schiff and counsel for the President:

Manager Schiff and Counsel for the President, are you aware that House Intelligence Committee staffer Shawn Misko had a close relationship with Eric Ciaramella when at the National Security Council together, and are you aware and how do you respond to reports that Ciaramella and Misko may have worked together to plot impeaching the President before there were formal House impeachment proceedings?”

For the second day in a row Chief Justice John Roberts refused to read Paul’s question.

Reading Ciaramella’s name out loud did not violate any laws.

And if it is true that Adam Schiff does not know who the whistleblower is, there is no harm in Roberts reading Paul’s question.

Instead Roberts refused to read Paul’s question.

That led to cries from conservatives that it should Roberts who is in fact impeached and removed from his position.

Roberts’ job is be a neutral judge presiding over the impeachment trial.

The Chief Justice is anything but.

To the contrary, the President’s lawyers are attempting to win acquittal when the presiding judge refuses to allow information into the record that could help prove the President’s innocence.

You may also like...

101 Responses

  1. Scholar says:

    `The question had nothing to do with the Impeachment Articles. The subject at issue was what the President did in regard to Ukraine and whether he should be removed from office for those actions. PERIOD.

    The person who presides at a trial is permitted to rule on relevance of material presented. Ask any judge.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: