This GOP Senator made an impeachment prediction to Sean Hannity that left jaws on the ground


The Democrats finally scratched their itch to impeach President Trump.

Now the President’s fate rests in the hands of the Republican controlled Senate.

And this GOP Senator just made an impeachment prediction to Sean Hannity that left jaws on the ground.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham is one of the key Republicans that will help shape the contours of a Senate trial.

Democrats need 20 Republicans to join them in voting to convict on articles of impeachment to remove President Trump from office.

That is far-fetched.

Democrats are now hoping to hold all 47 Democrats and pick off couple weak-kneed Republicans so they can claim while the Senate did not convict the President, a majority of the Senate voted to remove the President from office.

But appearing on Sean Hannity’s Fox News program, Lindsey Graham dashed those hopes predicting that the vote to acquit the President would be bipartisan.

Breitbart reports:

On Wednesday’s broadcast of the Fox News Channel’s “Hannity,” Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-SC) stated that he thinks that there will be bipartisan support for acquitting President Trump in the Senate.

Graham said, “We’re going to acquit the president. I think it will be bipartisan, sooner rather than later, and the political consequences to this will be felt in the next election.

West Virgina’s Joe Manchine, Alabama Senator Doug Jones and Arizona Democrat Krysten Sinema are all representing red states and would be likely to vote to acquit Donald Trump.

All three are rabid leftists, but would love the opportunity to falsely claim to be moderates by voting to acquit Donald Trump.

You may also like...

99 Responses

  1. Culper Ring says:

    But is that the truth?

  2. Culper Ring says:

    Probably never. The people calling for hangings could wind up being hanged themselves, but maybe it is worth the sacrifice if the totality of injustices could be exposed. Politicians generally don’t take such risks.

  3. James 75th Regiment says:

    Marie YovanoWitch and old Uncle Joe(aka) Corn Pop were close as were him and Fiona Hill. Just like Scott and Roger states this whole bunch of parasites made the perfect plan to cover their misdeeds, MAYBE…. The main snitches should be persecuted ASAP, as George Washington stated about Benedict Arnold, no due process. Hanging on the spot… Eric Ciaramella and Lt.Col. Alex Vindman and Ms.Chalupa, new rope starting with her…

  4. Will Triebel says:

    Tom, face it, it’s not the Republican party destroying itself with hate, and you know it. That’s why you frightened little trolls are lashing out like spoiled toddlers, and making up such ridiculous stories trying to project your own very obvious hatred, bigotry and racism.
    The entire phony ‘impeachment’ mess is nothing but a failing and desperate attempt to keep the Democrat party from completely disintegrating, and is only self destructing even faster in the unhinged attempt.
    So, get ready for 5 more years of Trump, the last 4 with Republicans controlling both the House and Senate, due to the failures of your own suicidal party.
    And as I’ve told you before, you are a hypocrite to speak of hate and racism when your own is so apparent in every post.

  5. Mark Brecker says:

    THIS SITE IS INFIRM; ALWAYS CLAIMING DUPLICATION ABOUT ORIGINALS [other than the name of the poster]. THEY COULD IMPROVE IF THEY’D READ THIS, BUT THEIR EGOS PREVENT IT.

  6. Mark Brecker says:

    TRUMP WILL NOT ONLY LOSE BUT HE WILL GIVE THE DEM BUMS A FILLIBUSTER PROOF SENATE. HE’S THE BEST THING THAT EVER HAPPENED; FOR THE DEMS.

  7. Mark Brecker says:

    ROBBIE,
    YOU CAN’T SAY TOM IS A RACIST [ipso facto] BUT WOULD HAVE BEEN GOOD IF HE PROVIDED SUFFICIENT INFO. SO WE WOULD KNOW ABOUT THAT WHICH HE IS ALLUDING, NO?

  8. Mark Brecker says:

    ROBBIE,
    YOU CAN’T SAY TOM IS A RACIST [ipso facto] BUT WOULD HAVE BEEN GOOD IF HE PROVIDED SUFFICIENT INFO. SO WE WOULD KNOW ABOUT THAT WHICH HE IS ALLUDING, NO?

  9. Mark Brecker says:

    ROBBIE, I DON’T THINK ONE CAN SAY TOM IS A RACIST, BUT I, FOR ONE, HAVE NO IDEA OF HIS FRAME OF REFERENCE AND WISH HE’D PROVIDED MORE INFO, YOU TOO?

  10. Mark Brecker says:

    YOU WERE RIGHT ON THE “MARK”, AND THEN STOOPED TO USE THE WORD “EXECUTION”. WHAT A DISAPPOINTMENT [and boon to the Dems]!

  11. Chenz says:

    SENATE NEEDS TO ACT! ,NOW!!
    DISMISS ! THE DEM SOCIAL COMMUMIST ARE STALLING TO
    PREVENT FAIR DUE PROCESS

  12. BHR says:

    The SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE, is not the next in line. The session was changed in the 1800’s but it was done illegally.
    The SECRETARY OF STATE IS NEXT IN LINE.

  13. D.A.N. says:

    Tom, your Speaker of the House is the one that is giving GOP members a Christmas gift. Because by refusing to forward those AofI to the Senate she has proven that Nadler and Schiff have again lied. You can’t square ” Imminent National Security Risk” with withholding them. I’d like to see the Senate now take the House to the SCOTUS to force the trial. And there, that actually might be a more level playing field. The House has had its chance at gathering evidence, now it up to the WH Counsel to shoot holes in the charges. Which should take all of about 15 minutes really. No criminal acts or laws broken or they would have been included. Telling the House to go jump in a lake because they failed to follow investigation requirements is not obstruction of Congress. It is standing up for the rules of law. Weasel Schiff may fave criminal charges before it is over.

  14. D.A.N. says:

    Nope! Not until it is transmitted to the Senate. There are people that a grand jury indicted that never got a trial so they never officially were charged with a crime. And that is exactly what you have here. Clinton was Impeached as his Articles Of Impeachment were transmitted to the Senate. And he actually had committed a criminal act. He lost his right to practice law also. The House could hold them until the next Congress is sworn in, and at that point the House under GOP control again, vote to reconsider. So hold them at your own peril Nancy, it only shows your rush was a fake like Schiff’s evidence.

  15. D.A.N. says:

    Well shoot Tom, if you start at two and double it that is four. That is easy. But if you start at four and double it, that is harder. Guess you don’t understand facts. By the way all of the US stock market’s indexes have hit new record highs since Trump took over. sometime all three major ones on the same day. What happened to the prediction that Trump was going to crash the markets that you on the left claimed when Trump was elected?

  16. D.A.N. says:

    And because of Judicial Watch, facts over feelings , the whole plot is being exposed. And there is head FISA Court Judge that is about to unleash some bad Karma on those who were involved in this sham. I’ve had the pleasure of seeing a judge lose it on a lawyer when they did wrong. And it wasn’t a male judge doing it to a female lawyer, it was a female judge and female lawyer. When the lawyer left she could not even look at us jury members because she was that badly shamed. You do not trifle with a judge as they can ruin your day/bank account. The lawyer had her cell phone seized too. 🙂 And she did not get it back when the case was over.

  17. D.A.N. says:

    I think that you might be surprised. The Senate is not full of hot heads like the House. They know that to retain their jobs that you don’t go against the voters and the call for impeachment is dropping. Now they are in recess, they have to go back and face their voters. Even Adam Schiff got knocked down a peg over his handling of it in the House. But it really doesn’t matter, other than the RINO Romney, you won’t see GOP members switching sides so it is DOA.

  18. D.A.N. says:

    Yep, a clear case of a big nothing burger. A bun with no meat.

  19. D.A.N. says:

    They can. It is called a voice vote. But it also is subject to challenge requiring a roll call vote. It was Nadler that called for the roll call vote because he was afraid that the Nays had won. 🙂 And he wanted to know who voted against the Dem block.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: