The Supreme Court just got some really bad news about its next Justice

The 2020 election will determine the shape of the Supreme Court for the next generation.

And any new Supreme Court nominees could reconfigure American life.

But the Supreme Court just got some really bad news about its next Justice.

Donald Trump won the 2016 election in part on his promise to appoint conservative Supreme Court justices.

The President made good on that pledge by nominating Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh to the bench.

But in a campaign swing through South Carolina, former Vice President Joe Biden falsely attacked President Trump’s judicial picks for not following the traditional reading of the Constitution.

Breitbart reports:

Former vice president Joe Biden told a town hall meeting Thursday evening that President Donald Trump’s judicial appointees have “no interest whatsoever in the traditional reading of the Constitution.”

He then caught himself and said: “I shouldn’t say ‘whatsoever.’ Don’t add that in there.”

Trump has prided himself on nominating constitutional originalists, who interpret the Constitution and the law through the original text as understood when written. Biden favors a “living Constitution” approach that interprets the Constitution and the law through a “penumbra” of rights beyond those actually provided in the text.

That was an insane comment by Biden.

Liberals like Biden are the ones that believe the Constitution is a “living” document that allows Justices to change its meaning as they see fit.

The idea of a living Constitution is how liberal justices imposed abortion and homosexual marriage on America.

And with this campaign appearance, Biden is promising to appoint Left-wing Supreme Court justices who will ignore what the Constitution says and eliminate the Second Amendment, suppress religious liberty, and gut free speech.


You may also like...

87 Responses

  1. chief1937 says:

    Until there is a constitutional amendment enacted by congress our constitution should be interpreted as it was written without judges injecting their opinions into it. Any judge that can not do that should be disqualified from serving on the court.

  2. Spanky says:

    Preston you don’t deserve the title SGT.
    Anyway as my post about know it alls you also have this terrible disease you know it all but I’m sure you knew that because you know it all just like your supreme leader the know it all but hey you already knew that just like he is a bigger tax cheat then even Al Capone you all ready knew that just like he claimed women just love when he grabs their pus#y but hey you already knew that just like he claimed he’s gone bankrupt more then anybody else you all ready knew that just like he broke the law of the constitution the Emoluments Clause but hey you already knew that just like he directed his sick sick followers to go out and kill mexicans weekend after weekend but hey you already knew that just like he laundered money for russian oligarchs threw his properties you already knew that just like how he committed a federal crime when he altered a NOWA weather document you all ready knew that just like he colluded with russia in 2016 you allready knew that just like when he claims not a racist bone in his body you already knew that just like when white house staff claims he sits around all day doing nothing but watch fox news you already knew that just like he claims he is pro life only white life that is you already knew that shall i go on and on no because your a KNOW IT ALL IT’S JUST THAT ACTUALLY YOU DONT KNOW S###

    • tracker says:

      As President Reagan once said: “The problem with our liberal friends is that they ‘know’ so much that just isn’t true”

    • Vince says:

      NO WAY you have a grasp on reality. NOAA deals with weather. All ready, allready and already. Well, 1 out of 3 is correct. (I used the word correct because you definitely aren’t Right) BTW judges should strictly interpret law whether they agree with it or not. Congress makes or changes laws. 3 separate but equal branches.

    • Rick says:

      Sorry, can you try saying this again in English? Can’t understand a word you’re saying.

    • Charles Harris says:

      OK. Now you can go back to CNN or to sleep.

    • Highplainsdrifter says:

      Spank, where or who told you all this. I am a avid reader, and love the truth. If you want me to believe you, show me. Anybody can say anything about anybody. Doesn’t mean it’s true. So, show me the facts. I would appreciate it.

  3. Alan says:

    A putz like Biden is a living creature. As for the constitution, while it can be amended, there is a specific procedure set out for such action, it is not a “living creature”, one that changes based on social whims of the moment.

  4. AlfromFl says:

    Trump’s picks are judges that follow the Constitution, not a living constitution. His focus is on that more so than whether the judge is conservative or liberal (if there are any who follow the constitution) I believe they call them textual interpretations or an origionalist (Scalia). Biden doesn’t know what or who he is and will pick the usual liberal “legislate from the bench” type judge that finds in favor of most democrat requests.

  5. Vasu Murti says:

    Instead of packing the courts with conservatives, I think pro-lifers should be pushing for a Constitutional Amendment to extend human rights to the unborn. The central issues in the abortion debate are the “personhood” or moral status of the unborn, and the extent of individual and marital privacy.

    Stephen Douglas has been quoted as having said in debate with Abraham Lincoln that human slavery be resolved through the democratic process.

    Let the people decide: if they “want slavery, they shall have it; if they prohibit slavery, it shall be prohibited.”

    Whether or not democracy is the ideal form of government is not the issue here, but since we live in a democracy, what is wrong with Douglas’ statement? It was through the democratic process that we gave women the right to vote, gave 18 year olds the right to vote, and even attempted the Equal Rights Amendment. Isn’t this how we should extend human rights to the unborn? Isn’t this how we should extend rights to animals?

    Pro-lifers compare Roe v. Wade to the Dred Scott decision of 1857. In both cases, rights were denied to an entire class of humans based upon an arbitrary criterion, such as developmental status or the color of the skin. The conclusion author Paul Nowak draws from this in Guerilla Apologetics for Life Issues is that the Supreme Court is not infallible.

    Roe v. Wade was decided in part by denying rights to the unborn, but also by assuming a right to privacy (Griswold v. Connecticut assumed a right to marital privacy regarding the use of contraception) not clearly spelled out in the Constitution.

    Can we overturn Roe without overturning Griswold?

    Is the solution to the abortion crisis to pack the Court with conservatives who might also oppose things like church-state separation (Nat Hentoff, an atheist, must have known that in the Newdow case regarding the words “under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance, Justice Scalia had to recuse himself from the case, because he didn’t believe in complete church-state separation) and deny us contraception and a right to privacy (Griswold)… or is the solution to enact a Constitutional Amendment to extend human rights to the unborn?

    And again, as Paul Nowak says, the Supreme Court is not infallible. The views of the Court are constantly changing. In 1986, the Supreme Court upheld a sodomy law. Years ago, they reversed themselves, which outraged the religious right, but pleased lesbians and gays, the parents and friends of lesbians and gays, and political liberals.

    I cannot understand how pro-life liberals and pro-life Democrats, most of whom respect the private nonviolent behavior of consenting adults, most of whom support church-state separation, and most of whom support contraception and better sex education as the most effective way to prevent unplanned pregnancies, would want to align themselves with pro-life conservatives and pro-life Republicans in order to pack the courts with conservatives in the hopes of eventually overturning Roe v. Wade.

    It’s my conviction that we do have a fundamental right to privacy, and I cannot advocate putting the women of America unwillingly under electronic surveillance, probing their past without their consent, denying them contraception, or even going through their personal effects (although the Fourth Amendment does protect us against unwarranted search and seizure). There must be a better way.

    Until we pro-life Democrats have enough numbers to change our Party platform to one calling for a Human Life Amendment (as is the case with the Republican Party), I think we should be advocating: easy access to contraception; better, more comprehensive sex education; real social support for pregnant women and children; and reasonable restrictions on abortion (e.g., a ban on partial-birth abortion, parental notification or consent, 24 hour waiting periods, informed consent or “women’s right to know” laws, etc.)

    Doing this would dramatically reduce the abortion rate, which would please both pro-lifers and pro-choicers alike within our Party. It would also be consistent with Bill Clinton’s “safe, legal and rare” position. If “safe, legal and rare” becomes the new mantra in the Democratic Party with regards to abortion, I will consider it real progress from the 1970s, when pro-choice bumper stickers read: “Abortion is every woman’s choice.”

    Again, instead of packing the courts with conservatives in the hopes of overturning Roe v. Wade, I favor grassroots activism and educating the American public about when human life begins, prenatal development, etc. in order to get them to eventually support a Constitutional Amendment to extend human rights to the unborn.

    If we Democrats prove to the American people *we’re* a “big tent” too, we can easily win, even in red states.

    Fifty-nine percent of Democrats favored a ban on partial-birth abortion. (Gallup Poll, November 1, 2000)

    Eighty-nine percent of Americans favored informed consent for women seeking abortions. (Gallup Poll, 2002)

    Sixty-seven percent of Democrats would outlaw some or all abortions. (Gallup Poll, May 5-7, 2003)

    Forty-three percent of Democrats agreed with the statement that abortion “destroys a human life and is manslaughter.” (Zogby Poll, December 2004)

    Seventy percent of high school senior females say they would not consider abortion if they became pregnant while in high school. (Hamilton College/Zogby Poll, January 2008)

    Seventy-seven percent of Americans believe abortion should have stricter limitations. (CBS News Poll, January 2008)

    Twenty-nine percent of Democratic Convention delegates disagreed with the statement, “Abortion should be generally available to those who want it rather than under stricter limits or not permitted.” However, 52 percent of Democratic voters as a whole disagreed. This large discrepancy between party leadership and membership indicates a serious problem that Democrats For Life of America wants to rectify.

    During the 2008 campaign, Reverend Jim Wallis (of Sojourners) advised Barack Obama to support a plank in the Democratic Party Platform that would aim to reduce abortions by focusing on supporting low income women and making adoption easier. (This is the 95-10 Initiative, advanced by pro-life Democrats in Congress.) Reverend Tony Campolo served on the Platform Committee and has issued a strong statement in support of a pro-life position.

    A “conscience clause” which appeared in the 2000 Democratic Platform (but not in 2004) acknowledges that there are pro-life people in our Party and we respect their views. It reads as follows:

    “We respect the conscience of each American and recognize that members of our Party have deeply held and sometimes differing positions on issues of personal conscience, like abortion and the death penalty. We recognize the diversity of views as a source of strength and we welcome into our ranks all Americans who may hold differing positions on these and other issues.”

    Kristen Day of Democrats For Life said in 2014: “Roughly a third of the Democratic Party is pro-life. And while many do not call themselves liberal, they share the values which seem to identify with liberalism, particularly a commitment to helping the vulnerable and providing a social safety net.”

    The Democratic Party platform should support: Animal Rights, Defending the Affordable Care Act, Ending Citizens United, Ending Marijuana Prohibition, Giving Greater Visibility to Pro-Life Democrats, Gun Control, Net Neutrality, Raising the Minimum Wage to $15 an Hour, Responding to the Scientific Consensus on Global Warming, and a Sustainable Energy Policy.

    Democrats for Life of America, 10521 Judicial Drive, #200, Fairfax, VA 22030, (703) 424-6663

    • gandolf the White says:

      Vasu Murti after that long, bloviating screed full of Demwit BS what did you say?

      • DeWayne says:

        I’m sorry you went through all of this and be wrong on one major point. We do not live in a democracy! America is a Republic! Two quotes you should be familiar with. Ben Franklin said, “a good definition of a democracy is when two wolves and a sheep decide what is for dinner.” James Madison said, “I have never seen a democracy that didn’t commit suicide.” In addition after the Constitutional Convention, a citizen asked Benjamin Franklin what kind of government our founders had given us. He replied, “A Republic, if you can keep it.”

        • D.A.N. says:

          Correct. We have a Constitutional Republic, not a Democracy. A Democracy is best described as mob rule. Ancient Greece was as close as there ever was one and it did not last long in that form.

  6. Charlie says:

    That’s just babble. He really doesn’t know what he said. Imagine him sitting down face to face with those in China or Russia debating important world situations? China would own the Hawaiian Islands and Russia would have Alaska
    And Biden wouldn’t know a thing about it Untill a month later. Enjoy the show.

  7. Cowboy says:

    The left, and leftist judges in particular, believe an executive order about anything can be signed into law by the President, no legislation needed. But if the next President signs an executive order countering one signed by a President they supported, it can’t be done because the new President didn’t get Congress to pass legislation. A perfect example of this is Obama changing our immigration laws with a stroke of his pen (DACA) being legal, but Trump can’t get rid of DACA by executive order because he didn’t get Congress to change the law. What one President does by executive order can be undone by a future President by executive order.

    • robert says:

      Really – in your example – if the previous Ex President signed an Illegal Executive Order – then the next President can issue a New Executive Order to countermand or change the Previous ILLEGAL EO x Why should this need Congress approval ??? Are you Guys Kidding ??? Who are these Leftist Judges ??

  8. Joe Bierce says:

    “Biden is promising to appoint Left-wing Supreme Court justices who will ignore what the Constitution says and eliminate the Second Amendment, suppress religious liberty, and gut free speech.”

    What have you heard or seen in print that says this explicitly? Wild accusations without documentation do us NO service, but harm what we stand for. Quote him and I will accept the statement . He would have to get any such appointment though the senate. Words mean things. Blather turns off the thinking person.

    • robert says:

      Promise or Talk Nonsense ? x Its not gonna Happen – the same as the Left’s Green New Deal or Medicare for All x Even the Leftist Base will finally wake up because they and ALL will not be exempt from the the Stupid and Insane Radical Ideas of the DemocRATs and the costs and taxes to be IMPOSED on ALL x yes thats right ALL individuals, Citizens, Clueless Birdbrained Americans included

  9. Walter says:

    Only a stupid Democrat woul think a written Document is a living thing. No this document was written in a time of moral character something the Dumb a Crats don’t have Morals. It is not to be tampered with and it is not open to what you want it to mean. I have seen people change the BIBLE to fit their needs , and now the Constitution what makes this country GREAT. I for one will not stand by while these people kill everything that the majority of Americans believe in and what makes us who we are and what our founding fathers fought for to make us free.

  10. Gail Thompson Mosley says:

    I suspect that Joe Biden isn’t stupid at all but that he suffers from a bad case of ADHD. I have it and recognize the signs. He should be tested. Plus a tad of dementia.

  11. NOBODY says:

    Bidden like the rest of the Dem’s and anti-American politicians don’t know our Constitution !
    other wise they’d shut-up!

    and the one’s that do hate it and ALWAYS will and try to get around it
    just look at the commie bastards they’ll show you.

  12. Frank says:

    How is this bad news for the Supreme Court? Biden will be lucky if he doesn’t get booed off the stage at the next debate. The rest of the bozos have as much appeal as a case of Syphilis.

  13. Wondering Woman says:

    Only a total idiot would take Joe Biden’s word for anything after all the idiotic gaffee’s he has made in his campaign rally speeches. If his mental state is so advanced that he cannot even remember the nanme of who he was VP for two terms, how can you trust anything he says about anything????
    Relax, fellow Americans, but do remember to get out and vote in 2020;
    Mark Taylor whose prophecy that Donald J Trump was our next president has been so accurate to date, said President Trump will have 2 terms, appoint a total of 5 SCOTUS members (so he still has 3 more to go) and hopefully enough of the deep state establishment traitors will be gone that we won’t have any more bougtht & paid for fake sexual accursers 3 ring circuses like in Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearings. Also hopefully a few more OUTSIDER patriotic congressional members will be on board & working with OUR PRESIDENT to MAGA & KAG forever more.

  14. Larry says:

    joe Biden is Totally Stupid and against American and Americans

  15. Timothy Toroian says:

    The NON-RELIGIOUS Democratic party doesn’t believe in ny higher power, a metaphysical or higher standard than falible man can concoct therefore they can reject the very premise of the Constitution and birth of the country and no literal reading of the Constitution. That non-religious garbage they put out this week is dangerous but VERY indicative of what our opposition truly is bordering on Satanic. Don’t forget, the most non-religious group of the 20th century was the Russian communist. Marx said religion was the opiate of the people but it is the standard that gave us the 10 Commandments whether or not you believe they came to us through Moses.

  16. Mike Flanagan says:

    When Biden Looses what ever he’s going to Disney Land just because he’s all fantasy.

    • mike grunewald says:

      he could become a Greeter at Disney that’s all he is good for but parents watch your girls he is a hands on greeter

  17. Rae says:

    How would “sloppy Joe” know what’s in the Constitution? Has he read it? Can he read?

  18. Steven Sipes says:

    It used to be the “right” and the “left”. I guess that has changed. It is now the “right” and the “wrong”.

  19. Elba Jack says:

    This article only applies if a left wing lunatic such as rbg gets anointed for life on the court. We can get the most conservative sob up there and the best we can hope for is to hold the status quo. Laws only apply to the law abiding citizenry.

  20. Tony says:

    The Re-Election of President Trump is the only thing that will save our Beloved Country and the Constitutional rights of American Citizens………..At least for the next 4-years.
    VOTE TRUMP 2020!!!!!!

  21. Bill says:

    The U.S. Constitution is the cornerstone or basis for the laws of this country as it should be. This document was considered so important by our founding fathers that rules for changing or amending it are set very high. It is not to be trifled with or changed on a whim. Having read the Constitution often and recently, the document itself details the exact steps to amend it. Nowhere did I find that judges can arbitrarily make law. If anyone doubts that this happens just ask yourself why the liberals always file suit with the Ninth Circuit Court in California. It is because the vast majority of judges in that district are liberals and assume they have the GOD given right to change a law just because they don’t like it.

    • vet says:

      great post Bill.I agree 1000%

    • D.A.N. says:

      And fortunately, Trump is filling the Ninth Circus with some judges that do follow the Constitution. That is why he is starting to win a few even there. They also do not have the right to make nationwide rulings. Those are for the Supreme Court and not these inferior courts. They only have a say in their District.

  22. Jim says:

    There will be no new Supreme Court justices.until after the 2020 election

  23. Jim says:

    There will be no new Supreme Court justices.until after the 2020 election

  24. Jack Blade says:

    Hope Trump appoints Amy Coney Barrett to replace Grandma who will retire or croak soon….MAGA!!! 👍

  25. Jack Blade says:

    Shotgun Joe wouldn’t know whether he was appointing a Supreme Court Justice or the Surgeon General…😂

  26. Leftshot says:

    “living Constitution”

    First of all, we have no Constitution if we can make it mean whatever 5 judges decide it is going to be.

    Second, this is an evil device leftists are using to overthrow our freedoms, our liberties, and our form of governance without a revolution or a constitutional convention.

    • Terry L says:

      when the founders stated “living document” they meant that it could be amended at any time to expand the rights of the people to address changes in society not that it gave anyone the ability to take away existing rights they already stated were God given and that no man can take them away just because some group was offended or terrified that we have the Bill of rights that outline the restrictions on the governments power over the people explicitly making the government serve the people instead of the people being enslaved to the government.

      So every time a politician campaigns on the promise to “punish” someone or some group for nothing more than exercising their constitutional rights or being better off than those who do less work than them they are spouting their belief that the constitutional rights of the people is something the government has the power to restrict or abolish at their whim when anyone who actually read the constitution and knows the definitions as they existed when it was written knows is not within the governments authority.

      The supreme court is supposed to be part of the checks and balances to ensure that unconstitutional restrictions (infringements) upon those rights are never allowed that any law imposing such infringements gets revoked they were never supposed to be able to amend such a law to allow the infringement to continue until the next person could afford to go through court again fighting the same infringement or create laws from the bench they “feel” should have existed.

      If any part of a law is unconstitutional the entire law is void not just the one sentence, word, paragraph, or section that made it unconstitutional. This includes all laws that impose the same infringement we were never supposed to have to go to court over and over again simply because politicians changed one or two words in a law but still had it deny the people their rights.

      So far we have judges that feel they can not only add to or take away from the constitution but ones that feel they can even change the very definition of words or phrases so they can falsely claim constitutional protections that do not exist are present in the constitution overriding the actual constitutional rights of the people if their beliefs or speech offends certain political groups.

  27. Gerald Ladd says:

    Bitme has never seen the constitution.

  28. Eva says:

    We need Trump 2020….

  29. Eagle109 says:

    President Trump makes me bite my lip sometimes with the things he tweets about people who diss him, but dang it, he is the best president since Reagan. Given more time, I’d like to think that President Reagan would have been working on the same problems that our current president is working on and that if Trump had come first he would have done the Reagan stuff first. Obama could do anything he wanted to do outside of the constitution and not one Democrat complained and only a few Republicans objected. Now that Trump is in the saddle, it’s almost as bad with so many RINOs against our president.

  30. Robert Martin says:

    Well if that happens the supreme court will no longer hold any power. The law of the land will have to go back to the people.

  31. David says:

    Dale, Are you serious? Have you ever been checked for any kind of brain damage? You are a big part of the problem, LIBERAL. People like you have no clue in History nor economics, and Political Science. You are a brain dead Asswipe. This is not a Democracy, IT’S A CONSTITUTION REPUBLIC

  32. JOHN TATUM says:

    When idiots that know nothing about the US, Inc. takeover and the fake constitution open their mouths, we should not allow their stupidity influence us.

  33. Cris says:



    This is for us

    Not them

    This world is ours

    Not their’s

    We are the wealthy

    They are not.

    But we must keep them
    fairly happy because they are
    the ones we employ
    to make us rich.

  34. Irma Vela says:

    If anyone follows the constitution, it is Trump. not liberals or democrat who want to make their own laws

  35. Dale says:

    When the United States is being taken over by a corrupted mob boss criminal president like Donald Trump then the whole country must band togather and protest.

    The morally good people of the united states must invade the White House, arrest Trump and his supporters in congress who are helping him steal our civil liberties.

    We must put democracy back where it belongs.


    • Denis says:

      We are not a democracy. The founders knew the dangers of “mob rule”. Go to ARTICLE 4 SECTION 4 of the US CONSTITUTION. No where in the CONSTITUTION is the word democracy used. Immorality doesn’t have civil rights because immoral behaviors are uncivil. Time for your brain transplant.

    • Irma Vela says:

      If anyone follows the constitution, it is Trump. not liberals or democrat who want to make their own laws

    • Harvey Schneider aka ConservativeOne says:

      Dale > > If red flag legislation is passed, i hope it doesn’t, you just made yourself ineligible fora weapon.

      You have made a terrorist threat. POTUS is NOT a boss criminal, but you have put a big TERRORIST sign on your chest.

      Please repent and show remorse and maybe the FBI will let you threat pass.

    • Mysty says:

      Dale your brain needs to be bleached. It’s contaminated.

    • Moejj says:

      “morally good people”? Whos’s that you triggered snowflake libTurd? your lame pAntifa? morons who beatup citizens with MAGA hats? What exactly has President Trump done that’s wrong? I’ll wait for until Y3K for you to *try* to think of something. You’re nothing but a brainless parrot repeating what you hear from CNN. Oh wait, I know “morally good people” the same murderers who kill unborn babies? Only in Bizarro world are you and your ilk “morally correct”. WHAT A JOKE!

      • StillDeplorable says:

        Well put Moejj.
        Although I can tell you what Trump has done wrong, he cleanly and clearly whooped Shrillary’s azz fair and square against all odds.
        The ‘tards actually believed the rhetoric of the lamestream media polls who predicted a sweep by their B_tch Goddess and have been b_tthurt since.
        Actually had some wingnut libt_rd on another blog trying to say there is documented evidence that Trump is a racists.
        When I requested documents, time location of indictment, CRIKETS!

    • Ron says:

      Where were you when the Organizer who falsified a document to get foreign aid at Occidental College and corrupted the military. We the people should have lynch him but know we bid our time and elected someone who spoke like real patriot Americans. So Trump is a hell of lot better than OBAMA.

    • Mike says:

      Apparently your blind, Democratic party trying to change are constitution but to stupid to realize it can’t be changed or removed, but added to it ,anything added,can make it stronger but can’t change its original meaning

    • David says:

      Dale, Are you serious? Have you ever been checked for any kind of brain damage? You are a big part of the problem, LIBERAL. People like you have no clue in History nor economics, and Political Science. You are a brain dead Asswipe. This is not a Democracy, IT’S A CONSTITUTION REPUBLIC

    • allanallen says:

      are you that Dumb dale? a sixth grader is smarter than you appartently

    • Frank says:

      You are a unamerican piece of RAt Sh_T!!!

    • terry says:

      You have no morals. You have no respect. You have no courtesy. You are a person whose sole fuction in life is to create mayhem and chaos- death and destruction- to serve satanic luciferian lawlessness. You have never lived under islamism, drug cartels, communism, nor abject poverty. You wish for a hell on earth and want to dream to call it heaven. I feel sorry for such disillusioned, misled, and hate filled people such as you.

    • Jack Blade says:

      What are you going to do about Trump and his supporters, Dale? 😂

    • Jan says:

      That sounds like what the RUSSIANS did when they went for communisim

    • Spanky says:

      Dale. Don’t pay attention to rolando there’s something very seriously wrong with him and many more blogging on this site there every where they all have a serious disease giving them the inability to think clearly they rant on about everything they know nothing about just like there supreme leader a know it all that knows nothing just like he claimed he never knew we’ve ever had a category 5 hurricane i remember earlier this year he claimed he knew more about rockets then people who build rockets and all these people here ate it up calling him the greatest thing on earth just goes to show you how far this disease has spread and how debilitating this disease is it is causing once reasonable people to do and say ridiculous things claiming that just like there supreme leader they somehow now are know it alls their Dr’s, professors, rocket scientists, shrinks that know eveything about the human mind, CEO’S, COO’S, surgeons, engineer’s, architects, teacher’s, coache’s, umpire’s, judge’s, lawyer’s, they can play better than any sport’s player, what ever anybody has done they can do it better just like their supreme leader the liar in chief even he can only lie that good he brags about being the biggest and best liar to ever live that’s what his legacy will be remembered for the only guy to live that lied everyday of his life because he’s a know it all just like his followers just like that other know it all that led his people and country to destruction and death that know it all was HITLER funny how history repeats itself funny but dangerous go LITTLE HITLER JR.

  36. SGT Preston says:

    The last person in the world I would want picking a Supreme court Jurist would be former VP Biden. He and his boss, Odumma have done more to destroy the US than any recent president in history, even Jimmy Carter.

  37. Mike Otrok says:

    What are hamberders? No one will answer.

    • Rodney says:

      Why do you really need to know what they are???????? If you really and truly need to know, watch The Pink Panther with Steve Martin!!!!! That will explain everything to you,mthat is you under the movie!!!!!!!

    • Delmar Bromm says:

      what is the relevance to Supreme Court Justices?

    • Mysty says:

      I finally figured you out mike otrok…you are 45 years old but only 3 years old mentally. I thought you were just stupid & obnoxious but now I understand. It isn’t your fault you are retarded.

      • Linda M. says:

        Mysty: I don’t know who are what that Mke Otrok is. But he is a troll who THINKS he’s funny. But more importantly , he tries to distract from the story at hand.When people ignore him, he does stop, somewhat. But have you noticed since he’s shown up, that fool Julio has disappeared? Well, whatever. There a few of these trolls that post under different names just to try to add credibility to their Leftist nonsense.. Just fools the lot of them….

        • Spanky says:

          Linda. Since you like to point out other peoples mistakes in grammer word spacing when to use comas,,,,, ect.
          Please oh please go back and correct your many mistakes.
          Oh i just remembered you already posted, too late!!!!!
          To eror is to be human, but since your not human I’d expect so much more intellect from an android, you know an AI manufactured droid bott.
          Anyway just so happy to point out your stupidity to all bloggers on this site, YOUR WELCOME!!!!😎
          And yet this clearly proves why we as americans have the problems we have today, too many know it all’s on the right.
          Just like the biggest know it all on earth your retard in chief, claimed he never knew we have or had a category 5 hurricane ever.
          I’m so glad between him and all his brainiac supporters, like you Linda, could not even blow out a candle if you all tried at once.
          But alas there is one thing your good at and that is killing inocent men women and children in mass shootings, just look at recent labor day weekend, so many dead just a miracle that inocent 17 mounth old beatiful girl survided, but I’m sure that all you GOD fearing gun loving IDIOTS are deeply disappointed there was not more carnage.
          So sick all you people on the right are.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: