Shocking video of Sharia Law “no go zones” could be America’s future

The Democrats’ dream for America is for our country to become a borderless state.

Other Western countries have opened their borders to mass immigration and they are now reaping the consequences.

And this shocking video shows what could happen in America if Democrats get their way.

Lauren Southern is a Canadian independent journalist and investigator. She has over 46 million views on her YouTube channel.

She got banned from the United Kingdom for her video exposing “no go zones” in London.

Now she released a new video where she was threatened by an Australian police officer for filming in a densely populated Muslim community outside of Sydney.

The officer questioned Southern, saying he had “grave concerns that she would cause an imminent breach of the peace” in the majority-Muslim community simply for walking around and asking people questions.

But what he really meant was it’s a “no go zone” for white Christian women.

Watch the full video below.

If the Democrats get their way, these “no go zones” could begin popping up in American cities.

They’re happy to rail against the so-called “white male patriarchy.”

But they refuse to admit that allowing unchecked immigration of foreigners who support Sharia Law would be a disaster for our liberty.

You may also like...

127 Responses

  1. zee says:

    Please Vasu, please – ‘educate’ me etc re Mohammed/ Muhammed/Islam.
    After that – educate re Hindii.
    Thank you so much.

  2. Vasu Murti says:

    Condemnations of alcohol and drunkenness can be found throughout the Bible. The ancient Hebrews regarded alcohol as both a blessing and a curse. God was praised because “He causes the grass to grow for the cattle and fruits and vegetables for man to cultivate that he may bring forth food from the earth. Wine to gladden the heart of man…” (Psalm 104:14-15)

    On the other hand, alcohol was also an instrument of God’s displeasure: “Thou hast made Thy people suffer hard things; Thou hast given us wine to drink that made us reel.” (Psalm 60:3)

    Wine was permitted for medicinal use. (Proverbs 31:6-7; I Timothy 5:23). At no place in the Bible is alcohol (or any other drug) explicitly forbidden. Drunkenness, or the excesses of alcohol (and presumably all other drugs) is condemned, but not the drug itself.

    Complete abstinence from intoxication, however, was considered a sign of holiness. God commanded His priests to be holy and pure before worship. “Do not drink wine nor strong drink, thou nor thy sons with thee, when you go into the tabernacle of the congregation, lest ye die: it shall be a perpetual statute for ever throughout your generations.” (Leviticus 10:9)

    God also established the order of the Nazarites. The Nazarites distinguished themselves by never allowing a razor to touch their head, abstaining from alcohol, and by their piety before God. “When either a man or woman shall separate themselves to vow a vow of a Nazarite…. he shall separate himself from wine and strong drink, and shall drink no vinegar of wine, or vinegar of strong drink, neither shall he drink any liquor of grapes…” (Numbers 6:1-21)

    Wine drinking was equated with sexual immorality and worshiping other gods: “Go, ye, love… an adulteress, according to the love of the Lord toward the children of Israel, who look to other gods, and love flagons of wine.” (Hosea 3:1) “Whoredom and wine and new wine take away the heart.” (Hosea 4:11)

    It appears that wine was never intended for kings or political leaders, because of its intoxicating effects. (Proverbs 31:4-5)

    Excesses of alcohol amongst religious leaders were also denounced in biblical times: “the priest and the prophet reel with strong drink, they are confused with wine, they stagger with strong drink; they err in vision, they stumble in giving judgment.” (Isaiah 28:7)

    According to Reverend Alvin Hart, an Episcopal priest in New York, the drinking of wine was frowned upon in biblical times. “Wine is a mocker, strong drink is raging; and whosoever is deceived thereby is not wise.” (Proverbs 20:1) Intoxicating beverages were known to be habit-forming (Proverbs 23:35), resulting in violence (Proverbs 4:17) and distracting their imbibers from God (Amos 6:6).

    The Bible says, “…wine is treacherous; the arrogant man shall not abide… woe unto him that giveth his neighbor drink.” (Habbakuk 2:5,15) And: “Who has sorrow? Who has strife? Who has complaining? Who has wounds without course? Who has redness of eyes? Those who tarry long over wine, those who try mixed wine. Do not look at wine when it is red, when it sparkles in the cup and goes down smoothly. At the last it bites like a serpent, and stings like an adder.” (Proverbs 23:29-32)

    John the Baptist never touched alcohol. Jesus told the multitudes: “John the Baptist came neither eating bread nor drinking wine…” (Luke 7:33) Jesus warned his disciples: “Be on your guard,” he warned, “so that your hearts are not overloaded with carousing, drunkenness, and worldly cares…be vigilant and pray unceasingly.” (Luke 21:34-36) Referring to Proverbs 23:20, Jesus condemned one who “eats and drinks with the drunken.” (Matthew 24:49; Luke 12:45)

    Peter linked alcoholic excesses to the gentile practices of idolatry and sexual immorality. “For we have spent enough of our past in doing the will of the gentiles — when we walked in lewdness, lusts, drunkenness, revelries, drinking parties and abominable idolatries.” (I Peter 4:3)

    Paul did not forbid wine. Instead, he advocated moderation. Wine is to be taken sparingly, if at all.

    “A bishop then, must be blameless, the husband of one wife, temperate, sober-minded, of good behavior, hospitable, able to teach; not given to wine, not violent, not greedy for money, but gentle, not quarrelsome, not covetous.” (I Timothy 3:2-3)

    “Likewise, deacons must be reverent, not double-tongued, not given to much wine, not greedy for money.” (I Timothy 3:2-3,8) For a bishop must be blameless, as a steward of God, not self-willed, not quick-tempered, not given to wine, not violent, not greedy for money, but hospitable, a lover of what is good, sober-minded, just, holy, self-controlled.” (Titus 1:7-8)

    “It was divinely proclaimed,” insisted the early church father Tertullian, “‘Wine and strong liquor shall you not drink, you and your sons after you.’ Now this prohibition of drink is essentially connected with the vegetable diet. Thus, where abstinence from wine is required by the Deity, or is vowed by man, there, too, may be understood suppression of gross feeding, for as is the eating, so is the drinking.

    “It is not consistent with truth that a man should sacrifice half of his stomach only to God–that he should be sober in drinking, but intemperate in eating. Your belly is your God, your liver is your temple, your paunch is your altar, the cook is your priest, and the fat steam is your Holy Spirit; the seasonings and the sauces are your chrisms, and your belchings are your prophesizing…”

    St. Basil (AD 320-79) taught, “The steam of meat darkens the light of the spirit. One can hardly have virtue if one enjoys meat meals and feasts… In the earthly paradise, there was no wine, no one sacrificed animals, and no one ate meat. Wine was only invented after the Deluge…

    “With simple living, well being increases in the household, animals are in safety, there is no shedding of blood, nor putting animals to death. The knife of the cook is needless, for the table is spread only with the fruits that nature gives, and with them they are content.”

    St. Jerome (AD 340-420) wrote to a monk in Milan who had abandoned vegetarianism:

    “As to the argument that in God’s second blessing (Genesis 9:3) permission was given to eat flesh–a permission not given in the first blessing (Genesis 1:29) — let him know that just as permission to put away a wife was, according to the words of the Saviour, not given from the beginning, but was granted to the human race by Moses because of the hardness of our hearts (Matthew 19:1-12), so also in like manner the eating of flesh was unknown until the Flood, but after the Flood, just as quails were given to the people when they murmured in the desert, so have sinews and the offensiveness been given to our teeth.

    “The Apostle, writing to the Ephesians, teaches us that God had purposed that in the fullness of time he would restore all things, and would draw to their beginning, even to Christ Jesus, all things that are in heaven or that are on earth. Whence also, the Saviour Himself in the Apocalypse of John says, ‘I am the Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end.’ From the beginning of human nature, we neither fed upon flesh nor did we put away our wives, nor were our foreskins taken away from us for a sign. We kept on this course until we arrived at the Flood.

    “But after the Flood, together with the giving of the Law, which no man could fulfill, the eating of flesh was brought in, and the putting away of wives was conceded to hardness of heart… But now that Christ has come in the end of time, and has turned back Omega to Alpha… neither is it permitted to us to put away our wives, nor are we circumcised, nor do we eat flesh.”

    St. Jerome was responsible for the Vulgate, or Latin version of the Bible, still in use today. He felt a vegetarian diet was best for those devoted to the pursuit of wisdom. He once wrote that he was not a follower of Pythagoras or Empodocles “who do not eat any living creature,” but concluded, “And so I too say to you: if you wish to be perfect, it is good not to drink wine and eat flesh.”

    “Thanks be to God!” wrote John Wesley, founder of Methodism, to the Bishop of London in 1747. “Since the time I gave up the use of flesh-meats and wine, I have been delivered from all physical ills.” Wesley was a vegetarian for spiritual reasons as well. He based his vegetarianism on the biblical prophecies concerning the Kingdom of Peace, where “on the new earth, no creature will kill, or hurt, or give pain to any other.” He further taught that animals “shall receive an ample amends for all their present sufferings.”

    Wesley’s teachings placed an emphasis on inner religion and the effect of the Holy Spirit upon the consciousness of such followers. Wesley taught that animals will attain heaven: in the “general deliverance” from the evils of this world, animals would be given “vigor, strength and swiftness…to a far higher degree than they ever enjoyed.”

    Wesley urged parents to educate their children about compassion towards animals. He wrote: “I am persuaded you are not insensible of the pain given to every Christian, every humane heart, by those savage diversions, bull-baiting, cock-fighting, horse-racing, and hunting.”

    The Bible Christian Church was a 19th century movement teaching vegetarianism, abstinence from wine, and compassion for animals. The church began in England in 1800, requiring all its members to take vows of abstinence from meat and wine. One of its first converts, William Metcalfe (1788-1862), immigrated to Philadelphia in 1817 with forty-one followers to establish a church in America. Metcalfe cited numerous biblical references to support his thesis that humans were meant to follow a vegetarian diet for reasons of health and compassion for animals.

    Although gambling is not explicitly forbidden in the Bible, it does prey upon the individual’s desire for worldly riches. This desire for immediate wealth and self-aggrandizement is contrary to the spirit of New Testament teaching.

    Jesus taught the multitudes to seek the eternal treasures in heaven rather than pursue temporary, earthly gain. He insisted upon the self-sacrifice and renunciation of earthly possessions and family ties and duties. (Matthew 6:19-21, 6:24-34, 8:21-22, 10:34-39, 19:20-21,29; Luke 9:57-62, 12:51-53, 14:25-26,33; James 5:1-3)

    Jesus had no interest in worldly disputes over income and property. (Luke 12:13-14) He taught that life is meant for more than the accumulation of material goods. He condemned those who lay up treasures for themselves, but are not rich towards God. (Luke 12:15-21) In his parable of Lazarus and the Rich Man, Jesus expressed concern for materialistic persons (Luke 16:19-31).

    Jesus taught that it is hard for those attached to earthly riches to enter the kingdom of God. (Matthew 19:16-24; Mark 10:17-23; Luke 18:18-25) His apostles lead lives of voluntary poverty; sharing their possessions with one another. Those among the brethren who did not do so were condemned. (Acts 2:44, 5:1-11)

    “He who loves his life will lose it,” taught Jesus, “and he who hates his life in this world will keep it for eternal life…For what profit is it to a man if he gains the whole world, and loses his own soul?” (Matthew 16:26; Mark 8:36; Luke 9:25; John 12:25)

    In Paul’s words:

    “Piety with contentment is great gain indeed; for we brought nothing into the world and, obviously, we can carry nothing out. When we have food and clothing, we shall be content with these.

    “Those who are eager to be rich fall into temptation and a snare, and into numerous thoughtless and hurtful cravings that plunge people into destruction and ruin.

    “For the love of money is the root of all evil. In striving for it, some have wandered away from the faith…But you, O man of God, shun these things and go after righteousness, godliness, faith, love, patience, gentleness.”

    – I Timothy 6:6-11

    Although a representative of the Catholic church once said, “There is no eleventh commandment against gambling,” conservative Protestants have traditionally taken a dim view of gambling.

    “I find it impossible even in my weakest moments,” wrote Richard Emrich in the Christian Century, “when the financial needs of the church are most pressing, to imagine St. John, St. Paul, or St. Peter running a bingo party or our Lord sending out his disciples to sell chances.

    “And I shudder at the thought that some young person might say, “It’s all right to gamble. We do it at church.”

    The Puritans of Massachusetts enacted America’s first law against gambling in 1638. In 1682, the Quakers in Pennsylvania passed their own law against gambling and “such like enticing, vain, and evil sports and games.”

    During the period from 1830 to 1860, lotteries were banned across America. By 1908, nearly every state in the nation had banned horse racing.

    Neil Reagan, older brother to Ronald Reagan, once said of his younger brother, “I don’t think he ever saw the inside of a pool hall,” indicating that even in mainstream secular American society, gambling carries with it a shady connotation.

    Again: the biblical tradition opposes gambling, but this is an implied idea, not clearly spelled out in Scripture.

    I bet this is true of the pro-life position and many other moral positions taken by differing denominations, too!

    My point is Christians today fail to see nondrinking, nonsmoking, abstinence from gambling, sexual restraint, vegetarianism, praising God, etc. as nonsectarian virtues, even though these values are taught in Christianity as well.

    There was an episode of The Brady Bunch in which Greg Brady is caught with cigarettes on him, he pleads innocence, and at the end of the episode, it’s discovered the cigarettes belong to a friend of his whose mother is involved in a campaign against teen smoking. Were the Brady Bunch “Mormon” ? Should we presume the anti-smoking campaign is Mormon? Of course not! Again, my point is Christians today fail to see nondrinking, nonsmoking, abstinence from gambling, sexual restraint, vegetarianism, praising God, etc. as nonsectarian virtues, even though these values are taught in Christianity as well. In recent decades, the straight edge punk scene has embraced these values.

    There was a time, a few generations ago, when being a Christian actually meant something. The values are nonsectarian virtues, and were once considered conservative Christian values.

    George W. Bush quits drinking and drugs, and as governor of Texas, endorses the “True Love Waits” campaign of young Christian teens pledging to save themselves for marriage… and everyone thinks that’s wonderful!

    There are over 40,000 different Christian denominations, from Catholics to Baptists to Unitarians to Mormons to Jehovah’s Witnesses to Christian Science to the United Church of Christ to Seventh Day Adventists, etc… and they all have differing views on grace versus works, the Trinity, the afterlife, the divinity of Jesus, faith healing, speaking in tongues, snake-handling, smoking, drinking, gambling, abortion, etc.

    Whether or not Jesus is God or an empowered representative serving on God’s behalf (which is closer to the Judaic concept of the messiah) and was later deified by his followers, is subject to debate. In Acts 2:22, Peter refers to Jesus as a “man certified by God.” The doctrine of the godhood of Jesus is questionable. (Matthew 12:18, 27:46; Mark 13:32; Luke 23:46; John 14:2, 17:21; Acts 2:22, 3:13).

    Yes, Jesus says, “The Father and I are one” (John 10:30), but he also prays with his disciples, “As You and I are one, let them (the disciples) also be one in us” (John 17:21), implying this “oneness” is a relationship others may also experience. The biblical phrase about Jesus sitting at the right hand of God would also be meaningless if there were not two distinct individuals — God and Jesus: the Lord and His servant.

    St. Peter referred to Jesus as “a man certified by God.” (Acts 2:22) Victor Paul Wierwille, founder of The Way International, wrote an entire book on the subject, entitled, Jesus Christ Is Not God. It is unclear to some Christians, having studied the Sanskrit literatures, whether Jesus is jiva-tattva (one of God’s children, like ourselves) or vishnu-tattva (an expansion of God Himself, like the Trinitarian conception).

    Jesus was a genuine historical personality, like Pythagoras, the Buddha, or Mahavira, around whom many contradictory legends (the resurrection, genealogies, the virgin birth, etc.) have emerged.

    First century Pythagoreanism is described in detail in The Life of Apollonius of Tiana. The ancient texts records this neoplatonic philosopher and miracle worker having a divine birth, absorbing the wisdom of Pythagoras, practicing celibacy, vegetarianism, as well as voluntary poverty; healing the sick, restoring sight to the blind, exorcising demons, foretelling the future, and teaching the innermost secrets of religion. Finally, the text says he never died, but went directly to heaven in a physical assumption.

    Sound familiar?

    But Apollonius of Tiana *was* a genuine historical personality, who lived from 40 – 120 AD!

    Similarly, Jesus *was* a genuine historical personality, around whom many contradictory legends (the resurrection, genealogies, the virgin birth, etc.) have emerged.

    Dr. Victor Paul Wierwille, founder of The Way International, wrote an entire book on the subject, entitled: Jesus Christ is not God.

    In his 1983 essay “A Jewish Encounter with the Bhagavad-gita,” Harold Kasimow discusses ideas “which seem totally incompatible with the Jewish tradition. The most striking example is the doctrine of incarnation, a concept which is as central to the Gita as it is to Christianity. According to the Gita, Krishna is an incarnation (avatar), or appearance of God in human form.

    “A study of the Jewish response to the Christian doctrine of incarnation shows that Jews, and I may add, Muslims have not been able to reconcile this idea with their own scriptural notion of God.”

    It is unclear to some Christians, having studied the Sanskrit literatures, whether Jesus is jiva-tattva (one of God’s children, like ourselves) or vishnu-tattva (an expansion of God Himself, like the Trinitarian conception).

    • joseph says:

      What ! You had all that and you said nothing.all you had to say was that Islam in their law are horrible they are not a peaceful religion they are the most violent religion or is and we better stop them like Constantine did in the 1300s before they take over the world! lastly, that woman should’ve been allowed down the streets with their cameras asking any question she wanted because if it was a Christianity or Catholic religion you know they were ripped apart!

  3. zee says:

    This VasuMurti IS on a ‘free speech’ Invasion Mission.
    > Erroneous Info at best. Bits& Pieces = True/False/Twisted.
    > Not to mention Lengthy/ Boring, in the ‘twist’/ Time Wasting.
    > All i need is a few Sentences, then Gone !!! So – Vasu, have NO
    Time to read your ‘somewhat ‘thoughts’. GO – PLEASE, Help
    Your Country of 0rigin., Help Your PPL. You Will DO Much Better There.

    • zee says:

      PS. Please Tell All, Vasu, re Mohammad./Muhammad & Islam.
      Forget ‘mixing & matching’ >Tell ALL the REAL Truth. First of
      All, YOU Need to Acknowledge the Truth for Yourself, & experience
      a ‘ComeUppance’ ____ ‘WE’ ‘ Know’. Already.

  4. Countrysunrise says:

    When Hillary paraded her Mr. Khan around, during the Democratic Convention, people were cheering, but a lot of people didn’t know “beans” about him, other than the fact that his son died in battle. Here are some facts. Mr. Khan happens to be Bill and Hillary’s bookkeeper. Loretta Lynch once worked for him, until Bill snatched her up. He has a NYC law firm that works with Legal Aid and Immigration for Muslims – especially Saudis. He worked for a DC law firm with direct ties to the Clinton Foundation and Muslim Brotherhood. He is trying to make Sharia Law legal. He helps his clients gain E-2 and EB-S visas, which provide green cards to foreign investors along with their families. One of his law firm’s lobbyists bundled more than $50,000 in donations to Hillary’s campaign. That could be why she paraded him around the stage!! All I know is that the man is bad news, and so is anyone associated with him. You’d have to look him up yourself, and read up on him. I’m not sure if I spelled the last name right, but he works at Hogan Lovells LLP in DC

  5. Rex Whitmer says:

    Not all Muslims fall into t his category, but enough do that it creates a hazard where ever Muslims choose to migrate to. The Muslim religion has more members than any other religious group on the planet! This aspect of the religion is what keeps its membership from leaving to go to another way of live. Generally speaking Muslims are a peaceful and nice group of persons, but, the person who leaves their numbers is in more danger than a murderer might be! As with all religions, some Muslims are very sensitive to their beliefs, while others are not, but the danger is that it depends on the group rather than the individual! They will always demand sharia law be given local recognition, though not all of them practice it. However if the USA continues to welcome more Muslims into the nation, it will not be many years before they first demand lto be allowed to practice sharia law in their community, and then, later demand that Sharia law become the law of the land! Liberals take heed, YOU will be their first victims! Liberalism is possibly one of their greatest sins!!!

  6. People in the USA watch out this is coming to you and if it does we as Americans are done and the Country that we once knew will never be the same ! So wake up America act now before it’s to late !!

  7. W FLATT says:

    From a life long reg. dem. If you have a nest of rattle snakes in you bed room you don’t pet them. Same goes for a group of people trying to destroy us, you don’t give them hundred of billions and fund them against us, like Obama did.

    • zee says:

      Hi WFlatt, do U remember DJT In Campaign??? ‘the ‘Snake story’ = in short:
      ” You knew i was a Snake Before you took me in” . Words from a famous song,
      > No truer words could ever be said. ___

  8. Vasu Murti says:

    If you read through all I’ve written, I think you’ll see my postings are fairly accurate. Americans are culturally isolated from the rest of the world. In 1980, during the Iranian hostage crisis, a local business in San Diego was vandalized. The owner pointed out to the local media that he and his family were from Iraq and not Iran.

    Similarly, Islam stands alongside Judaism and Christianity as an Abrahamic faith (worshipping the One God of Abraham), and is therefore a Western religion, whereas the ancient eastern reincarnationist religions which predate Christianity (Hinduism, Buddhism and Jainism) are not counted among the Abrahamic faiths.

    Americans are very particular when it comes to their own faith. In 1989, my friend Greg said to my friend Rankin, a former Missionary Baptist minister, that his older sister Claire is a born again Christian. Rankin brushed aside Greg’s words by saying he grew up in St. John, Kansas, and was familiar with all of the various types of Christian fundamentalism.

    Greg countered that born agains are different from fundamentalists. If only Americans would show this kind of discernment and understanding when it comes to people of other faiths!

    To prevent religious strife, India, too, like the United States, is officially religion-neutral or secular. As a Hindu-American born in the USA, my point is made tactfully and diplomatically. Christians of differing persuasions (Baptists, born agains, fundamentalists) distinguish themselves from each other, and don’t like being lumped together with a broad brush stroke… Please “do unto others…” with other religions as well.

    Years ago, on the Huffington Post, when a Muslim writer claimed to have an agape moment in a Hindu temple, someone commented in response about Hinduism and Islam: you could not have picked two more dissimilar religions! Hindus and Muslims have traditionally been at odds with each other: Jews and Muslims don’t worship images. Jews and Muslims don’t believe in the incarnations of God. Jews and Muslims don’t worship a plural Godhead, like that of Trinitarian Christianity. Jews and Muslims don’t worship other human beings (saints and spiritual masters in disciples succession).

    Hindu philosophy and metaphysics can be found in Hesiod, Pythagoras, Empodocles, Hippocrates and the Hippocratic Oath Socrates, Plato, Ovid, Apollonius of Tiana, Plotinus, Porphyry, Emerson, Thoreau, and Schopenhauer, but conservative Christians have felt more at ease with Islam than with Hinduism, which they have often regarded as an earlier animistic, idolatrous, pagan, polytheistic religion of multi-armed gods and goddesses, sacred cows, sacred rivers, sacred mountains, and sacred plants, etc., predating Christianity.

    Islam, on the other hand, stands alongside Judaism and Christianity as an Abrahamic faith, and to an outsider like myself, these religions appear to be very similar with a belief in Adam and Eve, Noah, Abraham, Moses, John the Baptist, Jesus, Satan, Judgment Day, etc… whereas the ancient eastern reincarnationist religions (Hinduism, Buddhism, and Jainism) which predate Christianity embrace a belief in karma and reincarnation, ahimsa or nonviolence towards humans and animals alike to the point of vegetarianism, a pantheon of demigods (as well as a Supreme Being, in the case of Hinduism), chakras, kundalini, yoga, meditation, etc.

    It seems Westerners in past decades were more knowledgeable about Hinduism than they are today, even it was only through stereotypes. There was an episode of Get Smart in 1967 which featured a disc jockey calling himself the “Groovy Guru” and playing music by a band calling themselves the Sacred Cows. In 1986, the British band Love & Rockets released their single, “Kundalini Express.”

    My dear friend, the late Reverend Janet Regina Hyland (1933 – 2007), raised Catholic, but went on to become an evangelical minister, involved with women’s rights, animal rights, and the plight of migrant farm works, a vegan, and author of God’s Covenant with Animals (it’s available through People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, or PETA), noted over fifteen years ago that Buddhism is now in vogue among young people as Hinduism was during the 1960s and 1970s. When Adam Yauch of the Beastie Boys passed away in 2012, it was reported that he was a practicing Buddhist, a vegan, and that he organized the Tibetan Freedom concerts.

    Again, Islam stands alongside Judaism and Christianity as an Abrahamic faith. Islam is a global faith. Nearly one person in seven in the world today—some 800 million people in over 75 countries—is a Muslim. Islam is, quite possibly, the fastest-growing religion on the globe. Introduced among the Arabs in the 7th century, Islam spread rapidly throughout the Middle East, North Africa and South Asia. Within a century, Islam controlled an empire larger than that of Rome or Alexander. “Islam” means “submission”—to God.

    “There is no God but Allah, and Mohammed is His messenger.”

    A solemn recitation of this confession of faith is required of every Muslim. According to Islamic tradition, the archangel Gabriel appeared to Mohammed in 610 AD and imparted to him the wisdom of the Koran, or “Recital.” At first, Mohammed was afraid he was going insane or was possessed by an evil spirit. But he soon became convinced this calling was truly from God.

    Muslims revere the Koran’s 114 “surahs” or chapters as the literal word of God, superceding all previous revelations (including the Bible) and correcting the alleged theological “errors” that had crept into Judaism and Christianity. The Koran itself is somewhat smaller than the New Testament.

    Mohammed taught that Jews and Christians have been worshipping Allah under a different name. The Koran recognizes Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, John the Baptist, Jesus and other biblical personalities as genuine prophets through whom God spoke. Whereas the Jewish people are said to be descended from Abraham through Isaac, Mohammed’s family lineage is traced to Abraham through the patriarch’s grandson Kedar, son of Ishmael (Genesis 25:13).

    Both Jesus and John the Baptist were considered prophets by the people. (Matthew 11:9, 21:11, 21:26, 21:46; Mark 6:15, 11:32; Luke 7:16, 7:26, 9:19, 24:19; John 4:19, 6:14, 7:40, 9:17) Jesus placed himself in the tradition of the prophets before him. (Matthew 13:57; Mark 6:4; Luke 4:24, 13:33; John 4:44) He frequently compared his ministry to the ministries of Noah, Lot and Jonah. (Matthew 10:15, 11:24, 12:39-40, 16:4, 24:37-39; Luke 10:12, 11:29,32, 17:26-29,32)

    Muslims, however, regard Mohammed (570-632 AD) as the greatest and final (or “seal”) of the prophets. Muslims deny the divinity of Jesus, as well as his crucifixion and resurrection. “They do blaspheme who say: ‘God is Christ the son of Mary’… Christ was merely an apostle,” the Koran asserts.

    Despite the high status accorded to Mohammed, Muslims do not worship him as a divine figure. For this reason, Muslims dislike being called “Mohammedans,” for the term incorrectly implies they worship Mohammed. Just as Jews don’t worship Moses, Muslims don’t worship Mohammed, either! “We of Islam,” they will carefully point out, “are monotheists. People of one God, like the Jews. We honor Moses and Jesus as prophets. And we honor Mohammed as the final and greatest prophet. But we do not worship him. We worship only one God: Allah.”

    Just as Jews pray towards Jerusalem, Muslims pray towards the holy city of Mecca five times each day. On Friday, Muslims observe a special day of public prayer in the mosque. During the entire holy month of Ramadan, the ninth month of the Muslim year, Muslims fast during daylight hours. Muslims are also expected to make a “hajj” or pilgrimage to the sacred city of Mecca at least once in their lifetime, if it is at all possible. Almsgiving to the poor, aged and orphans is another obligation required of Muslims. A yearly 2.5 percent “zakat” tax is levied against one’s total assets.

    In addition to these major directives, the Koran forbids gambling, the eating of carrion or animals that died of natural causes, the consumption of animal blood, foods offered to pagan gods and idols (compare Genesis 9:3; Acts 15), pork and alcohol. The Koran vividly describes punishment in hell and reward in paradise.

    The “Sharia,” or Islamic Law has been condemned in the West as cruel and barbaric. The penalty for habitual thievery may be loss of a hand. The penalty for premarital sex may be a hundred lashes in public. The Islamic codes of justice, however, are similar to the civil and criminal laws found in Exodus 21-23. Muslim countries have significantly lower crime rates than the Western nations.

    Many Muslims, too, are alarmed at the resurgence of Islamic fundamentalism sweeping the Middle East. In an interview before his assassination, Anwar Sadat, President of Egypt, pointed out that the brutality of the Khomeini regime in Iran could not be called true “Islam” any more than the Crusades or the Inquisition could be called genuine “Christianity.” The taking of hostages—especially diplomatic ones—is clearly forbidden in Islamic tradition. “I do not break treaties, nor do I make prisoners of envoys,” Mohammed insisted. Many Muslims saw the taking of American hostages by Iran in 1979 as an embarrassment to Islam.

    Mohammed actually advanced the status of women significantly, offering them greater honor than most societies of his time. “O men, respect women who have borne you as mothers,” teaches the Koran. Muslim women were given civil and property rights—a revolutionary step in the Arab world. The practice of wearing a “chador” or a veil is not mandated by the Koran; this cultural practice appeared centuries after Mohammed. The Koran merely asks women to dress “modestly.” As far as polygamy is concerned, few Muslim males have more than one wife. The Koran allows four—if the husband can afford to provide and care for them, and if he can treat them without partiality.

    And well after the Muslims conquered India, Muslim rulers like Aurangzeb attacked what they mistook to be “idolatry” and “polytheism.” Many Hindu temples were destroyed. On doctrinal issues, Muslims oppose the Christian worship of the Trinity, which they term “the triple God.” As in Judaism, God is a singular Being, who has no equal. Muslims see the Trinitarian concept of God as disguised polytheism and, therefore, sacreligious. The Catholic veneration of saints and use of images in worship is also regarded as idolatry and polytheism by Muslims. A friend and roommate in college, Stu Perlman, told me he learned in Hebrew school that Judaism and Islam are very close.

    Again, Hindus and Muslims have traditionally been at odds with each other: Jews and Muslims don’t worship images. Jews and Muslims don’t believe in the incarnations of God. Jews and Muslims don’t worship a plural Godhead, like that of Trinitarian Christianity. Jews and Muslims don’t worship other human beings (saints and spiritual masters in disciples succession).

    Hindu philosophy and metaphysics can be found in Hesiod, Pythagoras, Empodocles, Hippocrates and the Hippocratic Oath Socrates, Plato, Ovid, Apollonius of Tiana, Plotinus, Porphyry, Emerson, Thoreau, and Schopenhauer, but conservative Christians have felt more at ease with Islam than with Hinduism, which they have often regarded as an earlier animistic, idolatrous, pagan, polytheistic religion of multi-armed gods and goddesses, sacred cows, sacred rivers, sacred mountains, and sacred plants, etc., predating Christianity.

    • Bob L says:

      Guess what????
      We don’t care what u think.

    • zee says:

      0hhhh N0000, you’re back . Please, GO & Help Your Heritage in Country of 0rigin.
      ‘They’ NEEd you v. Much. Your 1000 word ‘lecture’??? IS Not Read & Actually a bit
      ‘boring’. I Research History & ( Ancient History) Elsewhere. Your words here, IF read at
      all, falls ‘moot’ . &&& fyi: your words need ‘some correction’. Do More DD.

  9. US is a Christian Nation Who ever likes Sharia Law let them to go back where ever they came from

  10. D C says:

    In response to Vasu Murti’s treatise on Christianity:
    The majority of your “information” comes from the Old Laws. Those that continued to follow the Old Laws were not considered true Christians–Paul speaks against this very issue in his letters–for Christ brought the New Laws of Christianity through His Life, Death and Resurrection. Other parts of your “information” are from some source that is completely erroneous–for instance, Paul was speaking about morality and that if a man was being immoral in his relationship with his betrothed, he should go ahead and marry rather than wait to do so in order not to sin. And the betrothed is described as “past her youth,” no age is given. I am sure “past her youth” could mean different things in different eras (Dark Ages, Renaissance, etc.) as life expectancy for each era differed. Regardless, the issue here is not which religion has had the most abhorrent past; regardless of it’s origins, every religion (belief system, theology, whatever term you prefer) has, eventually, been “shepherded” by men (read mankind here), non of whom are without sin. Enough said there. And none disagree with the right of the President of Egypt to interpret his religion and rule however he sees fit. All of this is a distraction to the main issue here, which is the illegality of practicing Sharia Law in these United States of America. Sharia Law is contrary to the very nature of the Constitution, its Amendments & the Bill of Rights of the United States. America has its own laws. They need to be followed. And they need to be enforced. Americans respect that.

    • Bob L says:

      Screw Sherry or whatever it is law!! And get the hell out of our country or we will send u home one way or another

  11. Vasu Murti says:

    The Abrahamic faiths (Judaism, Christianity, Islam) are patriarchal religions, so I would say the patriarchy is a greater threat to the secular West than Islam. The Quiverfull movement in Protestant Christianity promotes child marriage in Christianity. For around $1200 per family, Quiverfull parents will spend three days “networking” with likeminded who believe men are to be in charge, wives are to be submissive baby-makers, and children are to be sheltered, isolated, indoctrinated, and pushed toward early, prolific marriages for Jesus.

    How early? Young men and women should get married as soon as possible:

    “When do boys become men and girls become women? When are their bodies developed enough to have children? When do they begin to develop romantic interest in the opposite sex, and when does fornication begin to become an issue? The Bible provides many reasons for marriage, and most if not all of them demonstrate that marriage typically ought to happen in the youth (as in, before the age of 20).”

    They actually mean to marry off their girls the minute their bodies have developed enough to have children:

    “John Calvin defines the ‘flower of her age’ (1 Corinthians 7:36) as ‘from twelve to twenty years of age.’ Likewise, John Gill defines it as ‘one of twelve years and a half old.’ And Martin Luther says, ‘A young man should marry at the age of twenty at the latest, a young woman at fifteen to eighteen…’ We do not endorse marriage at ages as young as twelve. Our position is that, for a woman:

    “The ‘youth’ ready for marriage has breasts. A woman who is to be married is one who has breasts; breasts which signal her readiness for marriage, and breasts who promise enjoyment for her husband. (We believe that ‘breasts’ here stand as a symbol for all forms of full secondary sexual characteristics.)

    “The ‘youth’ ready for marriage is ready to bear children. Unlike modern society Scripture sees the woman as a bearer, nurser, and raiser of children. The ‘young woman’ is the woman whose body is physically ready for these things, physically mature enough to handle them without damage.

    “The ‘youth’ ready for marriage is one who is ready for sexual intercourse sexually and emotionally. Her desire is for her husband, and she is ready to rejoice in him physically.”

    Why do they want to rush their kids into marriage and coerce them to start having babies as soon as possible?

    “[W]e know from scientific studies (as well as first-hand knowledge, in many cases) that the fertility of women (and even men, to some extent) goes down steadily after the age of twenty, and dips even more sharply after thirty and forty. This is even more the case if a woman has reached such an age without having had any children yet. So, by reason of these facts, it is clear that it is best to marry much earlier than thirty to better fulfill the command to be ‘fruitful and multiply.’

    “Scripture speaks of the father of the son ‘taking a wife’ for his son, and the father of the bride ‘giving’ her to her husband…. It gives example after example of young women being given to young men, without the young woman even being consulted, and often, in some of the most Godly marriages in Scripture, the young man is not consulted….

    “Some use the idea of ‘consent’ to deny the very relevance of the action of their authorities to bind them in covenant, as if a covenant was of no effect whatsoever and all that matters is what the person themselves decide. Others consider a covenant to be something substantial but that it is not really binding until the person themselves ‘consents.’

    “In contrast, our study of Scripture has shown that the Word of God considers a covenant made by an authority to be meaningful and binding upon the those under his or her authority. Biblical consent is not the ‘consent’ of dating or courtship. It is not a ‘veto’ power. It does not presume to cast judgment over their father’s actions. And so, a lack of consent of the individual concerned is a choice of disobedience, a breach of a vow and of a relationship. God has designed the marriage relationship (in particular that of the virgin daughter marrying the virgin son) to be a relationship initiated by the parents, in particular the fathers, of the young couple. This is the example that God uses constantly in Scripture, and even where an example strays from this, these principles are still kept in focus.”

    Some of these patriarchs go so far as to expect to get them married as soon as possible:

    “Bride price: What is it, and why is it important? Wouldn’t a bride price be like selling your daughter? A ‘bride price’ is anything paid or given by the man or his representative at the time of his betrothal or receiving his bride.

    “Scripture certainly teaches about it, but it is not mandated, however, except in the case of a couple of laws. The law concerning bride price (Exodus 22:16-17) indicates that part of the punishment for fornication with an unbetrothed woman is the payment of a ‘standard’ bride price for virgins, indicating that the bride price was a normal part of the marriage process.

    “The bride price plays a significant function: It shows the woman’s value, and the point isn’t that the father gets the money but that he keeps it for his daughter, if her husband should ever abandon her.”

    Heard enough? Seriously, this is what True Believers™ in the Quiverfull world consider “godly” and “biblical.” … actual young women and men whose “choice” is to obediently honor their fathers, or else face the wrath of God and the hordes of hell for daring to believe that their lives are their own to do with as they please.

    The fact that American liberals refer derisively to the Christian Right in this country as “the American Taliban” indicates disdain American liberals have for the Islamic Taliban, too! Conservative Christians demonize Islam as cruel and barbaric, forgetting Christianity’s own record of barbarism, whereas liberals merely see Islam as six hundred years behind the secular West. Think back to what Christianity was like six hundred years ago: the Crusades, the Inquisition, burning witches at the stake, etc. If Christians today are tolerant and civilized, it’s due to the past five hundred years of SECULAR social progress nearly all of which were resisted by previous generations of Christians:

    …democracy and representative government in place of monarchy and belief in the divine right of kings; the separation of church and state; the abolition of human slavery; the emancipation of women; birth control; the sexual revolution; LGBT rights…

    A hundred years ago, for example, ALL Christian churches opposed birth control. Fifty years ago, they were saying a divorced man could never be elected president, and saying that’s what impeded Nelson Rockefeller’s chances of becoming president. Forty years ago, unmarried couples living together was mildly scandalous, and reflected as such on TV shows like Mark and Mindy and Three’s Company. Fifteen years ago, there weren’t even any *Democratic* politicians in favor of same-sex marriage!

    Sexual morality for Christians is detailed in I Corinthians 7. If Christians actually followed the biblical commands against fornication and sexual immorality in general (Romans 1:24-27; I Corinthians 5:1,9-12, 6:9-10,15,18; I Thessalonians 4:3-5; ); as well as the commands that women cover their heads while worshiping (I Corinthians 11:5-14); Christian women are to dress modestly and prudently, and are not to be adorned with braided hair, gold or pearls or expensive clothes (I Timothy 2:9); Christian women are to keep silent in the churches and Christian women are not allowed to teach nor hold authority over men (I Corinthians 14:34-35; I Timothy 2:11-15)… Christianity would resemble Islam!

    Genesis 38:24. Tamar’s pregnancy was discovered three months after conception. This was proof that she was sexually active. Because she was a widow, without a husband, she was assumed to be a prostitute. Her father-in-law, Judah, ordered that she be burned alive for her crime. The “Sharia,” or Islamic Law has been condemned in the West as cruel and barbaric. The penalty for habitual thievery may be loss of a hand. The penalty for premarital sex may be a hundred lashes in public. The Islamic codes of justice, however, are similar the civil and criminal laws found in Exodus 21-23.

    The Puritans of Massachusetts enacted America’s first law against gambling in 1638. In 1682, the Quakers in Pennsylvania passed their own law against gambling and “such like enticing, vain, and evil sports and games.” During the period from 1830 to 1860, lotteries were banned across America. By 1908, nearly every state in the nation had banned horse racing. Muslims were a virtually nonexistent minority in Protestant-dominated America when these laws when into effect. Nor did the Muslims coin the term “sin city” to refer to Las Vegas. The Muslims didn’t coin the term “demon rum” to refer to alcohol, nor were the Muslims responsible for the Prohibition of alcohol in the United States. Conservative Christians also take a dim view of alcohol.

    Before casting the first stone at Islam, Christians would be wise to take a closer look at their own tradition. Many Muslims, too, are alarmed at the resurgence of Islamic fundamentalism sweeping the Middle East. In an interview before his assassination, Anwar Sadat, President of Egypt, pointed out that the brutality of the Khomeini regime in Iran could not be called true “Islam” any more than the Crusades or the Inquisition could be called genuine “Christianity.” The taking of hostages—especially diplomatic ones—is clearly forbidden in Islamic tradition. “I do not break treaties, nor do I make prisoners of envoys,” Mohammed insisted. Many Muslims saw the taking of American hostages by Iran in 1979 as an embarrassment to Islam.

  12. Mike H says:

    Keep all the Muslims out of our country. All we talk about is trying to fix the problem when it’s here. How about not letting it start. They can take their sharia law back to their country and perform it all they want ,just not here. It’s unbelievable that we create our own problems and then we can’t figure out how to fix them. The Democrats could care less if our country is overtaken by Any country. Danielle You got to be the stupidest woman alive.Before you spew your garbage you need to know what the hell you’re talking about.

  13. D C says:

    Danielle, That is simplistic, error-filled logic. But completely indicative of most liberal tripe: take an extremely complex situation or theory, muddle it with over-generalizations or erroneous parallels, dumb it all down for the masses, even better–give it a name like, I don’t know, maybe uh, “Republican?” and shout this fake narrative from the rooftops so you can rope in more would-be supporters who don’t bother to research issues for themselves. By the way, some here would not label themselves as belonging to any one political party. Just: AMERICAN.

  14. D C says:

    Vasa Murti,
    You have mixed the issues here in giving the names of some famous Arab-American Christians (who, of course, do or did not follow Sharia law) when the issue is the unsuitability and even unlawfulness under the Constitution of allowing any form of Sharia Law to be practiced in the United States of America.

  15. ALL MUSLIMS SHOULD BE SENT BACK TO THE COUNTRIES YHEY COME FROM >AND THE NO GO ZONE
    SHOULD NOT BE IN ANY CIVILIZED COUNTRY>: THE POLICE OFFICERS SHOULD GO IN TO THOES AREAS AND TAKE ANY ONE THAT TRIES TO USE SHARIA LAW>:

  16. Savior says:

    You don’t hear of Anyone wanting to become citizens from any Free Countries in the Middle East, it’s the other way around, we do however have to be aware that the Muslim religion which is also their Law, their Goal is to take Over the world and in doing that they have to 1st invade and get a foothold in other countries like European Countries, North & South America and All countries that aren’t Muslim. With that begins their take over and it doesn’t matter how long that takes, they are very patient and will do and take as long as is necessary to make that happen……so you Do-Gooders best beware in helping their cause and keep your Heads on your shoulders…..

  17. Danielle says:

    Sharia Law seems to match Republican ideology. Women’s rights are dictated by men, prayer in school, a mixture of church and state… You Republicans would love that!!

    • Robert Terry Moore says:

      Danielle, ordinarily, I do not respond to such statements, but your comment I find one of the most outrageous and disgusting posts I have seen from a woman who should know better.

      • Bob L says:

        Just another uneducated Lib Nut that just repeats the same I hated America and Christianity narrative.
        What a shame

      • Laurel says:

        Robert, you are so correct in your response to Danielle. Not only is she obviously democrat, but probably atheist as well. Guess she likes living without morals. Hope anarchy , martial law, and general lawlessness when it harms those she cares about.But she won’t see the connection

    • Actually we would love it if you brainless libs would just eat s… and die.

    • Tell me what rights you are deprived of. Give me facts.

    • bwtty says:

      Danielle is a communist following the rules for radicals: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.; create the issues or problems; deflect criticism and blame the other side; Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty. She knows these are lies and she’s just making up stuff. Ignore her. Do not recognize her…

  18. Katherine says:

    When Satan rises up, the faithful has to exterminate, and it is coming, because our government is only strong against Americans, to much money in their pockets to get rid of Satan and his followers.

  19. john says:

    Muslim=cancer, both must be destroyed!

    • Bob L says:

      Keep these POS’s out of America and any of them allowed must be scrutinized to the limit. If you over stay your visa like 90% of everyone does you r not allowed back in the USA ever again

    • von Potter says:

      THANK GOD for the 2nd AMENDMENT……….TNT, SYNTEX, and everyone’s CPL’s….

      • russell says:

        we need it to stand our ground if needed

        • Bob L says:

          I say we boot them ALL out now before all the idiot Lib Nuts jumb on the I love Issis and MS-13 band wagon.
          Can anyone believe what the Lib Nuts are willing to do to ruin America!! Their party should be disbanded as a threat to our country

    • russell says:

      way to go

  20. Vasu Murti says:

    Conservatives demonize Islam as cruel and barbaric, forgetting Christianity’s own record of barbarism, whereas liberals merely see Islam as six hundred years behind the secular West. Think back to what Christianity was like six hundred years ago: the Crusades, the Inquisition, burning witches at the stake, etc. If Christians today are tolerant and civilized, it’s due to the past five hundred years of SECULAR social progress nearly all of which were resisted by previous generations of Christians:

    …democracy and representative government in place of monarchy and belief in the divine right of kings; the separation of church and state; the abolition of human slavery; the emancipation of women; birth control; the sexual revolution; LGBT rights…

    A hundred years ago, for example, ALL Christian churches opposed birth control. Fifty years ago, they were saying a divorced man could never be elected president. Forty years ago, unmarried couples living together was mildly scandalous, and reflected as such on television shows like More and Mindy and Three’s Company.

    Sexual morality for Christians is detailed in I Corinthians 7. If Christians actually followed the very Scriptures they publicly profess to believe in: the biblical commands against fornication and sexual immorality in general (Romans 1:24-27; I Corinthians 5:1,9-12, 6:9-10,15,18; I Thessalonians 4:3-5; ); as well as the commands that women cover their heads while worshiping (I Corinthians 11:5-14); Christian women are to dress modestly and prudently, and are not to be adorned with braided hair, gold or pearls or expensive clothes (I Timothy 2:9); Christian women are to keep silent in the churches and Christian women are not allowed to teach nor hold authority over men (I Corinthians 14:34-35; I Timothy 2:11-15)… Christianity would resemble Islam!

    Genesis 38:24. Tamar’s pregnancy was discovered three months after conception. This was proof that she was sexually active. Because she was a widow, without a husband, she was assumed to be a prostitute. Her father-in-law, Judah, ordered that she be burned alive for her crime. The “Sharia,” or Islamic Law has been condemned in the West as cruel and barbaric. The penalty for habitual thievery may be loss of a hand. The penalty for premarital sex may be a hundred lashes in public. The Islamic codes of justice, again, are similar to the civil and criminal laws found in Exodus 21-23.

    The Puritans of Massachusetts enacted America’s first law against gambling in 1638. In 1682, the Quakers in Pennsylvania passed their own law against gambling and “such like enticing, vain, and evil sports and games.” During the period from 1830 to 1860, lotteries were banned across America. By 1908, nearly every state in the nation had banned horse racing. Muslims were a virtually nonexistent minority in Protestant-dominated America when these laws when into effect. Nor did the Muslims coin the term “sin city” to refer to Las Vegas.

    The Muslims didn’t coin the term “demon rum” to refer to alcohol, nor were the Muslims responsible for the Prohibition of alcohol in the United States, as they were virtually nonexistent as a minority nearly a hundred years ago when Prohibition went into effect. Conservative Christians tend to take a dim view of alcohol, too.

    Before casting the first stone at Islam, Christians would be wise to take a closer look at their own tradition. Many Muslims, too, are alarmed at the resurgence of Islamic fundamentalism sweeping the Middle East. In an interview before his assassination, Anwar Sadat, President of Egypt, pointed out that the brutality of the Khomeini regime in Iran could not be called true “Islam” any more than the Crusades or the Inquisition could be called genuine “Christianity.” The taking of hostages—especially diplomatic ones—is clearly forbidden in Islamic tradition. “I do not break treaties, nor do I make prisoners of envoys,” Mohammed insisted. Many Muslims saw the taking of American hostages by Iran in 1979 as an embarrassment to Islam.

    Far from treating Barack Obama as a regular American guy in love with Michelle, the Republicans accused him of being a “Muslim” even though Article VI, Section 3 of the Constitution clearly states: “No religious test shall be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.”

    Barack Obama has often been his own worse critic, and I think by being critical of America, he’s doing so as an *American* (and a Christian).

    As a new president, he dismissed the idea of American exceptionalism, noting that Greeks think their country is special, too. He labeled the Bush-era interrogation practices, euphemistically called “harsh” for years, as torture. America, he has suggested, has much to answer given its history in Latin America and the Middle East.

    And at the National Prayer Breakfast in 2015, Obama noted pointedly that his fellow Christians, who make up a vast majority of Americans, should perhaps not be the ones who cast the first stone.

    “Humanity has been grappling with these questions throughout human history,” he told the group, speaking of the tension between the compassionate and murderous acts religion can inspire. “And lest we get on our high horse and think this is unique to some other place, remember that during the Crusades and the Inquisition, people committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ. In our home country, slavery and Jim Crow all too often was justified in the name of Christ.”

    The First Amendment reads: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion (meaning the government can’t favor one religion over another) nor prohibiting the free exercise thereof (people are free to believe or disbelieve in whatever they want, the government is laissez-faire on all belief and disbelief).”

    But as I’ve pointed out before, by putting “In God We Trust” on the currency and the words “under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance, the government is favoring theism over non-theism, which is *not* laissez-faire!

    Thomas Jefferson said, “The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts as are only injurious to others. But it does no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.”

    Thomas Jefferson, the architect of American democracy was clearly politically laissez-faire toward all religious belief AND disbelief. (see above.) When the government favors one set of beliefs over another (e.g., Nativity scenes on public property, rather than on private property, where they belong), it sends the wrong message to religious minorities: it tells them they are not welcome here, or their faith is not as important as the majority faith.

    The Bible is NOT the law of the land, and neither is Sharia Law, nor Mosaic Law, nor atheism (as was the case in the former Soviet Union. Thomas Jefferson didn’t care whether his neighbor believed in twenty gods or no god. Religious leaders warned that if Jefferson were elected president, Bibles would be confiscated, churches would be closed down, etc. Clearly, that didn’t happen. Secularists are NOT atheists!

  21. zee says:

    Oh my, Australia has been/IS ‘boondoggled. Not good. Wet’noodled’ Australian police.
    V. Sad. & IN-excusable. Where ARE the Aussies ??? NOT speaking up’ ? ARE they Stewpid???
    > Anyway. fyi MICH seems to be scheduled for ‘Sanctuary State’ – dead center surrounded
    by water inbetween CA & NY. ALL Gubernatorial Candidates in MI have No prob re ‘0pen
    migration’, EXCEPT for one . & THAT Person IS PATRICK COLBECK. So, IF anyone here
    from MICH, reading this , Vote PATRICK COLBECK. OR E,lse MI. ‘falls in 10 yrs. Not Good.
    & We Will Take LARGE ‘Prayers’ from ppl in Diff. States. Thank you.

  22. I only have one thing to say about this article…that will be the day that my family or I will ever be stopped from going anywhere, by sharia law no go zones. That is not the law in our country, and it will not be practiced anywhere near me. By that I mean I will not allow it to sanction me or mine, from moving freely about in my own country, my own city, my own community. It has become a question of life or liberty, and I choose liberty.

    • Bob L says:

      Agreeded . And if these Guests in my country gets out of line and law enforcement does nothing as usual…..,,,we the people have all the rights in the world to finish the job ourselves if necessary.

    • russell says:

      they are not the law we have our go back to your war torn country

    • zee says:

      Go Ahead Walkin 0″Shea, Walk INTO a No-Go-Zone w/your Fam & See how U like it.
      > No joke. Also, i suspect YOU WOULD NEVER Take Your Fam. to A-N0-G0 anyway.
      >Talk Is ‘cheap’. Experience U have not. I have ( & lived in unsuspecting Ignorance)- in quasi ‘covered up’ re ‘illegal immis’ & their activities.
      still here (w/out further detail ). soooo – whatever. Capish.

  23. John Craig says:

    I have one thing to point out to Ed Stover, we do not live in a democratic republic! Do you know the difference between a democracy and a republic, perhaps not! We live in a Republic, governed by a Constitution, not in a democracy! There is all ready a couple of no go zones in the USA, Dearborn, Michigan a small plot outside of Boston and a fence bordered area in the Smokey Mountains, that supposedly, the US government, is watching and listening for info!

    • Bob L says:

      Yeah I bet they are listening with F’ n ear plugs in. They will sit on thier asses as usual and wait for something bad to happen then figure it out.

  24. off the hook says:

    Islam is a THEOCRACY, which is Religion, Government Politic, and Culture ! If any Muslim takes the Oath Of Citizenship to be a U S Citizen, they must reject that THEOLOGY, or their U S citizenship Oath was a LIE, and citizenship is Null and Void !!

  25. Albedamned! says:

    I live in cesspool of New York City, the Bronx. Every third world louse is here. The democrats have ruined this once Republican American dream borough because they pander to an ignorant base. The bringers of Sharia law, are growing tremendously, They are all here on the American taxpayers dime, not in the liberal lowlifes expensive and exclusive neighborhoods. They have been trying to push the last of the American flag wavers out. This is not why this country lost blood and lives in all the wars for. If this is not stopped, this will guarantee the end of this country as we know it. It will become a sewerand everyone’s safety and quality of life will be forever ruined. Wake up America!

  26. Ed Stover says:

    The U. S. Constitution and Sharia Law
    Throughout the history of this world there really have only been two kinds of law. We have given these systems of law very descriptive and easy names to remember. They are Rulers’ Law and People’s Law. Every legal system can fit under one of these two broad banners. Under Ruler’s Law, the king or dictator makes the law. Under People’s Law, the people make or accept the law by which they live. It is interesting that some of the most dominant kinds of legal systems have come about when it is claimed to emanate from God. Under Ruler’s Law, if the ruler can make the people believe he has a divine right to rule, he can persuade the people to do about anything and the use of force becomes acceptable to many people if done in the name of God. Under People’s Law, as was the case in Ancient Israel, when the people accepted Jehovah as their King and accepted His laws as their laws, it had a powerful persuasiveness to right actions. The major difference was that there was no use of force. Not even God would force a leader or laws on a people they did not willingly accept, because He respects the agency of man. Religion has been a powerful force throughout history in either types of law.

    In following the example of Ancient Israel, America’s Founders set forth laws based on the laws of nature and of nature’s God. It has catapulted the United States to an unmatched position as the most prosperous and freest nation on earth.

    Now we are faced with the same kind of threat that has been seen in the past-a system of compulsory laws which has the use of force at its very core and which claims to emanate from God. It is called Sharia Law.

    In 2010, an exhaustive study was published by a group of top security policy experts concerned with the preeminent totalitarian threat of our time: the legal-political-military doctrine known within Islam as Shariah. The study was designed to provide a “second opinion” on the official assessments of this threat as put forth by the United States government, which assessments included co-existence, accommodation, and even submission. By permission, much of the following is taken from this study.

    What is Sharia?
    The Arabic word “shariah,” according to one modern English-language student textbook on Islam, “literally means a straight path (Quran 45:18) or an endless supply of water. It is the term used to describe the rules of the lifestyle ordained by Allah. In more practical terms, shariah includes all the do’s and don’ts of Islam.” In other words, shariah is held by mainstream Islamic authorities – not to be confused with “radical,” “extremist” or “political” elements said to operate at the fringes of Islam – to be the perfect expression of divine will and justice and thus is the supreme law that must comprehensively govern all aspects of Muslims’ lives, irrespective of when or where they live. Shariah is characterized as a “complete way of life” (social, cultural, military, religious, and political), governed from cradle to grave by Islamic law.

    While there are a few additional sources for sharia, the most notable and authoritative is the Quran. In Islamic parlance, the Quran is considered to be the uncreated word of Allah. According to Muslim belief, it has existed since the beginning of time and was revealed by the Archangel Gabriel in the 7th Century to the Prophet Mohammed in the Arabic language of his homeland. It is interesting to note that the verses in the Quran are not compiled in chronological order of revelations but are organized from longest to shortest. This presents confusion in trying to read the Quran. Also, there is really no central authority to clarify or interpret the versus, so many are left to their own understanding of the writings.

    While many, many millions of Muslims around the world do not practice their faith in a manner consistent with shariah, those who do practice shariah have grounds for arguing that their version of Islam is the authoritative one because of the Islamic doctrine of abrogation-which holds that the later verses supersedes or abrogates the earlier ones. As a result, the later verses become much more violent and forceful in relation to non-Muslims. For example:

    “Fight and slay the unbelievers wherever ye find them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem of war. But if they repent, and establish regular prayers and practice regular charity, then open the way for them; for Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful. (Q 9:5)

    “Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Apostle, nor acknowledge the religion of truth, even if they are of the people of the Book [meaning Christians and Jews], until they pay the jizya [taxes on non-Muslims] with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. (Q 9:29)

    Shariah is Anti-Constitutional
    Whether pursued through the violent form of jihad (holy war) or stealthier practices that shariah Islamists often refer to as “dawa” (the “call to Islam”), shariah rejects fundamental premises of American society and values:

    the bedrock proposition that the governed have a right to make law for themselves;

    the democratic republic governed by the Constitution;

    freedom of conscience; individual liberty

    freedom of expression (including the liberty to analyze and criticize shariah);

    economic liberty (including private property);

    equal treatment under the law (including that of men and women, and of Muslims and non-Muslims);

    freedom from cruel and unusual punishments; an unequivocal condemnation of terrorism (i.e., one that is based on a common sense meaning of the term and does not rationalize barbarity as legitimate “resistance”); and

    an abiding commitment to deflate and resolve political controversies by the ordinary mechanisms of our democratic republic, not wanton violence. The subversion campaign known as “civilization jihad” must not be confused with, or tolerated as, a constitutionally protected form of religious practice. Its ambitions transcend what American law recognizes as the sacrosanct realm of private conscience and belief. It seeks to supplant our Constitution with its own totalitarian framework.

    America’s Founders and Islam
    America’s earliest presidents best understood these founding principles. They were not only deeply involved with their formal adoption, but they were professionally competent in explaining them. When confronted with an Islamic threat, they took the effort to consult primary sources and to conduct competent analysis of that threat.

    In 1786, Thomas Jefferson, ambassador to France, and John Adams, ambassador to England, met with the emissary of the Islamic potentates of Tripoli to Britain, Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja, regarding the demands for tribute being made at the time by the so-called Barbary Pirates.

    Afterwards, Jefferson and Adams sent a four-page report to the Congress describing this meeting. The relevant portion of their report reads:

    “We took the liberty to make some inquiries concerning the Grounds of their pretentions to make war upon Nations who had done them no Injury, and observed that we considered all mankind as our friends who had done us no wrong, nor had given us any provocation.

    “The Ambassador answered us that it was founded on the Laws of their prophet, that it was written in their Qur’an, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and that every Musselman [Muslim] who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.”

    John Adams’ son and our sixth president, John Quincy Adams, whose formative years coincided with the founding of the republic, offers further insights into the early presidents’ views on this subject. Like many Americans, he took an oath to uphold and defend the U.S. Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic. And, when faced with an Islamic enemy, he understood his obligation to be educated on the factual aspects of the principles, doctrines, objectives, jurisprudence and theology of shariah that comprised his enemy’s threat doctrine.

    John Quincy Adams’ 136-page series of essays on Islam displayed a clear understanding of the threat facing America then – and now, especially from the permanent Islamic institutions of jihad and dhimmitude. Regarding these two topics, Adams states:

    “…[Mohammed] declared undistinguishing and exterminating war, as a part of his religion, against all the rest of mankind…. The precept of the Quran is, perpetual war against all who deny, that [Mohammed] is the prophet of God.

    “The vanquished may purchase their lives, by the payment of tribute. As the essential principle of [Mohammed’s] faith is the subjugation of others by the sword; it is only by force, that his false doctrines can be dispelled, and his power annihilated.

    “The commands of the prophet may be performed alike, by fraud, or by force.

    “This appeal to the natural hatred of the Mussulmen towards the infidels is in just accordance with the precepts of the Quran. The document [the Quran] does not attempt to disguise it, nor even pretend that the enmity of those whom it styles the infidels, is any other than the necessary consequence of the hatred borne by the Mussulmen to them – the paragraph itself, is a forcible example of the contrasted character of the two religions.

    “The fundamental doctrine of the Christian religion is the extirpation of hatred from the human heart. It forbids the exercise of it, even towards enemies. There is no denomination of Christians, which denies or misunderstands this doctrine. All understand it alike – all acknowledge its obligations; and however imperfectly, in the purposes of Divine Providence, its efficacy has been shown in the practice of Christians, it has not been wholly inoperative upon them. Its effect has been upon the manners of nations. It has mitigated the horrors of war – it has softened the features of slavery – it has humanized the intercourse of social life. The unqualified acknowledgement of a duty does not, indeed, suffice to insure its performance. Hatred is yet a passion, but too powerful upon the hearts of Christians. Yet they cannot indulge it, except by the sacrifice of their principles, and the conscious violation of their duties. No state paper from a Christian hand, could, without trampling the precepts of its Lord and Master, have commenced by an open proclamation of hatred to any portion of the human race. The Ottoman lays it down as the foundation of his discourse.”

    In conclusion, it is clear from the writings of several of our earliest presidents, as well as the texts of the nation’s founding documents, that American principles are not at odds with – and imperiled by – some “radical” or “extreme” version of Islam. Rather, it is the mainstream doctrine of shariah that constitutes the threat to the U.S. Constitution and the freedoms it enshrines. That incompatibility has several practical implications: For one thing, the shariah legal code cannot be insinuated into America – even through stealthy means or democratic processes – without violating the Constitution’s Article VI Supremacy Clause, which requires that the Constitution “shall be the supreme Law of the land.”

    Even more reprehensible is the willingness of some among America’s elites, and it would appear even a subset of its elected leaders, to accede to these groups’ increasingly insistent contention that shariah is compatible with the U.S. Constitution. In fact, based on shariah’s tenets, its core attributes – especially its intolerance of other faiths and disfavored populations and its bid for supremacy over all other legal or political systems, there can be no confusion on this score: As the Framers fully understood, shariah is an enemy of the United States Constitution. The two are incompatible.

    Sincerely,

    Earl Taylor, Jr.

    Source: Guandolo, John; Gaffney, Frank; Lopez, Clare; McCarthy, Andrew; Cooper, Henry; Brim, Christine; Del Rosso, Michael; Coughlin, Stephen; Woolsey, Jim; Boykin, William (2010-09-22). Shariah: The Threat to America. Center for Security Policy Press. Kindle Edition.

    Please note:

    Printed and mailed copies of our newsletter are sent monthly as a Thank You to our regular donors. For others of you who wish to get a free electronic copy of our newsletters, please go to our website, http://www.nccs.net , and share with us your email address. You will receive the newsletter via email.

  27. Oat 45 says:

    Anyone who practices Sharia law in America is committing a criminal act and should be tried, convicted and thrown in jail to fit the crime of any Sharia Law crime. I’m shocked that the Australian government would allow such a place to exist in Australia and hoping these groups in Michigan, Oregon, Washington, California and the like will be crushed for any Sharia law they may attempt to practice.

    • russell says:

      you got that right

    • zee says:

      0at 45, fyi = Happening NOW in USA. the ‘Stand Down’ re Sharia IS Here. Just not reported in msm.
      MI IS ‘stand down lite’ for now. Not Reported. Capish.
      > Also, Quraan STATES: 0K to Lie, Play Nice (in short) Until ‘the Clarion CALL’ . Study
      Quraan if U have ‘the time’ ( of which U do not- & that;s 0k.) U/me , e’one has a Life to Live.
      > Butt, WHEN Demographics Are’ Tipped’ thru 0PEN Immigration = Then ‘Normal USA
      ppl ‘ Will Be ‘Screwed ‘ by the Dems, Rinos, Establishment NWO etc.

  28. DC says:

    Any U. S. government–city, county, state, or federal–that allows Sharia Law is committing Treason against the United States of America and its People. Islam considers Sharia Law ABOVE ALL other law. That means “true believers” of Islam consider their laws above the U. S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights and its Amendments. And Islamists will use our Freedoms (Right to peaceful assembly, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Religion, etc.) against us to further their laws and then work to take them from us. They intend to takeover our country one “no go zone” at a time by infiltrating our civic, county, state and federal governments & weakening our laws through precedents. Be vigilant. Serve in your city, county, state and federal governments where you can. VOTE when you cannot serve. Thoroughly research and vet your prospective candidates & Vote wisely. Make no mistake, Islam is only secondarily a religion, and then a manmade one. It is First and Primarily an ideology: a certain set of ideals, principals & doctrines of a group that explains how society [in this case Islam] should work and offers a blueprint for a certain social order–the order Islam wants to prevail.

      • Joan Landreth says:

        This is America, follow our constitution or GET OUT!!! Who are the IDIOTS that allowed any of this sharia stuff to be here, let alone take over parts of our country??? We’ve got to give the citizens an opportunity to use our right to vote and let the majority approve the laws. We can over-turn the decision that was made by “whomever”, that has allowed them to change our laws and SEND THEM PACKING BACK FROM WHERE THEY CAME!!!

    • russell says:

      throw the swine out

  29. D.C. says:

    ISLAM is NOT a Religion, it is an Ideology, complete with instructions on how to take over other countries. A vote for a Muslim man or woman in ANY government position is a vote for Sharia Law. There is NO separation of Church & State in Islam, which means that the government under Islam would be into every wrinkle of your private lives, including your marriage bed. VOTE wisely.

  30. Richard McClure says:

    And a lot of people think MS-13 is Pure evil with Rape,Kill, Control. This Religious Ideology makes them look like School Yard Bullies and has no Place in a Modern World and the the fact that they will never Assimilate should be the biggest Fundamental to even allowing them into any country that has Different Religions and Values. They already Claim Sharia in some parts of this Country and this should be met with force from our Govt. leaders but hay Democrats have been Commie’s since they Assassinated the 2 Kennedy Boys with the help of their Brother.

  31. Ron says:

    America already has a couple of No Go Zones. I have read Dearborn, MI is one such [lace.

  32. A. von Kleist says:

    Castration for all male ‘mooslums’ at birth would be a good remedy.

    • Bob L says:

      Indeed. But just not here in the US. The F’n lying Lib Nuts r under some illusion that is the American tax payer wants these Muslims here r lying again by making up ” FAKE VOTER POLL ” ETC. To lie and try and convince us the tax-bill payers this is a good thing.
      Well all I c is more bills to pay with no say in the matter. NO WONDER WE ARE 21 TRILLION IN DEBT. Hello !!!!! We can’t continue to pay everyone bills
      NO WAY!!!!

  33. Rick says:

    Liberals are so stupid they are okay with enacting Sharia Law in the USA!

    Twenty-three bills have been introduced in 18 state legislatures this year to ban the practice of Islamic law.The rash of new bills brings the total number of such legislative efforts since 2010 to 217 in 43 states, according to the Haas Institute at UC Berkeley which monitors the anti-sharia movement.

    1 You can rape, marry and divorce pre-pubescent girls; Qur’an 65:4

    2. You can enslave for sex and work; Qur’an 4:3, 4:24, 5:89, 33:50, 58:3, 70:30

    3. You can beat sex slaves, work slaves, and wives Qur’an 4:34

    4. You will need 4 Muslim male witnesses to prove a rape; Qur’an 24:4

    5. Kill Jews and Christians if they do not convert or pay Jizya tax; Qur’an 9:29

    6. Crucify and amputate non–Muslims; Qur’an 8:13, 47:4

    7. You will kill non–Muslims to receive 72 virgins in heaven; Qur’an 9:11

    8. You will kill anyone who leaves Islam; Qur’an 2:217, 4:49

    9. You will behead non–Muslims; Qur’an 8:12, 47,4

    10. You will kill and be killed for Al’llah (verse of the sword) Qur’an 9:5

    11. You will terrorized non–Muslims: Qur’an 8:12, 8:60

    12. Steal from non–Muslims: Qur’an Chapter 8 (booty/spoils of war)

    13. Lie to strengthen Islam; Qur’an 3:26, 3:54, 9:3 16:106, 40:28

    Teenage girls who are forced to marry. Hands amputated as punishment for theft. Women who are rarely allowed to leave the house and, when they do, are required to wear oppressive, black burqas covering their bodies, faces, and hands.

    In 2008 a Moroccan man and his 17-year old wife immigrated to America. Not long after she filed a restraining order against him, claiming her husband was raping her. The husband did not deny their sexual relations were non-consensual, but said that in his religion, the wife was supposed to submit and do all that he desired of her. The New Jersey judge found that given his understanding of Islam, he did not intend to commit a crime, and was therefore innocent. The restraining order was denied.

    • Parduc says:

      Obviously the Qur’an is copied from the Talmud:
      “Every Jew, who spills the blood of the godless (non-Jews), is doing the same as making a sacrifice to God.” Talmud: Bammidber raba c 21 & Jalkut 772
      Sanhedrin 57a . A Jew need not pay a gentile (“Cuthean”) the wages owed him for work.
      Sanhedrin 57a . When a Jew murders a gentile (“Cuthean”), there will be no death penalty. What a Jew steals from a gentile, he may keep.
      “A heretic Gentile you may kill outright with your own hands.” Talmud, Abodah Zara, 4b
      Sanhedrin 54b. A Jew may have sex with a child as long as the child is less than nine years old.
      Kethuboth 11b. “When a grown-up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing.”

    • Bob L says:

      They all need to be Deported now period. If they don’t like who the F cares

  34. Walt says:

    Americans, Islam is trying to take over the world. Christians cannot let this happen. ISIS and other Muslim groups of Islamic people need to be removed from the USA and other countries. Americans see what these Radical Islamic Terrorist are teaching in the Muslim Islamic Mosques, then they are sent to become radicalized and come back to kill Americans, Jews, Christians and non-Islamic folks. This tells the story and Islam is not a religion, instead it is a cult and taking over the world. Americans need to close all of the Mosques and deport all of the Muslims that practice the Sharia Law, get them out of America. Americans need to understand that Islam is not a peaceful religion and they are out to change Americas Constitution, laws, rules, regulations and try and take over the world. Obama and Hillary Clinton want to allow thousands more into the USA which will allow more of these barbaric savages in our country and get more people killed. Read below what these Islamic animals believe, their ideology and why they want to kill Americans and non-Islamic people.

    From the Qur’an:
    65:4 You can rape, marry divorce pre-pubescent girls.
    4:3, 4:24, 33:50, 79:29-30 You can enslave for sex and work.
    4:34 You can beat women.
    24:4 You will need 4 Muslim female witnesses to prove rape
    9:111 You will kill non-Muslims to receive 72 virgins in heaven
    2:217, 4:89 You will kill anyone who leaves Islam
    8:12, 47:4 You will behead non-Muslims
    9:5 You will kill and be killed for Allah (verse of the sword)
    8:12, 8:60 You will terrorize non-Muslims
    9:29 Kill Jews and Christians if they do not convert or pay Jizya tax
    chapter 8 (booty/spoils of war) Steal from non-Muslims
    8:12, 47:4 Crucify and amputate non-Muslims
    3:54, 9:3, 16:106, 40:28, 2:225 Lie to strengthen Islam (Taqiyya deception)
    9:111 Lo! Allah hath bought from the believers their lives and their wealth because the Garden will be theirs: they shall fight in the way of Allah and shall slay and be slain.

    Islam = Terrorism?

  35. In the event of a civil war, we know where to begin.

  36. Gary Adler says:

    No go zones are a blessing. It lets us know exactly where to bomb.

  37. Sherman Sanders says:

    “ZERO TOLERANCE” for Sharia law in this country (the United States) of constitutional law that has been in existence for over 200 years and has made this the free-ist country in the world.

  38. Ron says:

    To Mott…this Country preach about being free…you’re missing the point…Sharia is not freedom!

  39. Daired Franks says:

    If you come to America, you live under America laws only.

  40. Frank W Brown says:

    Hey, boys and girls, take a hard look at DEARBORN, MICH., NO-GO zones are ALREADY HERE folks!

    • Marlene says:

      Ah I was about to say that. But there are more no go zones here. There are about 28 terrorist training camps here we can’t go. Our own laws protect them as private property. So unless we have proof of wrong doing they can’t be touched.

  41. BOBBE says:

    VOTE REPUBLICAN PLEASE

  42. Bob Higginbotham says:

    There is no place in America for Sharia law. I suspect that anyone in favor of it beside empty headed male Muslims have never read it. Sharia law is the most despicable piece of garbage held over from the dark ages. It denigrates all women Muslim or not and all non Muslim men. It allows “honor killing”, rape and many, many other actions normally considered major crimes. It is diametrically opposed to our Constitution.

  43. Bama Bill says:

    The Muslims have a word, “Hijrah”, which means “Conquer by Immigration”. You do know that under Sharia law each wife MUST bear her husband at least 10 children. Hamtramck Michigan is now under Muslim control. They legally voted themselves into the city council and took over. Now you try to go to the park, they throw stones at the “Infidels” and run you out.

  44. Shari is not compatible with American law or the Constitution! And Americans should feel safe to go anywhere in America.

  45. glenn dupuis says:

    I believe it would be good for a group of Christians and Diane Feinstein, Nancy Pelosi,and Chuck Schumer to visit Dearborn Michigan to see how they are treated.I can guarantee the outcome, but the test will never happen.After visiting Dearborn, visit one of the Jihadist training camps.

  46. The Captain says:

    If everyone would just have a pig in their yard…..

  47. b says:

    i have spent some time in
    Australia and believe me you do now have freedoms there.
    They make a big show of being a free country but after being there a few weeks you can see the difference.

  48. Mott says:

    You come to ANY country you follow THEIR laws! You don’t like it, Don’t let the door hit you on your way OUT!

  49. Mary Ann says:

    I agree 100% no shari law here. Our law is the constatution!!

  50. Carrie Sweat says:

    That would be the anthesis of America!

  51. Bill Baswell says:

    Served in the Middle East. Do not want that crap here! Fight it with everything possible!

  52. Richard Daugherty says:

    “Islam in a man is like rabies in a dog” Winston Churchill.

  53. Rodger Shull says:

    run out sharia law an santuary cities, an those that want it, go to. not to be practiced here in THE USA. Our laws are not practiced in their 3rd world SH*T-HOLES. So their laws not welcomed or practiced here.

    • David Taylor says:

      Sorry to disagree with you, BUT there ARE areas with large mooselimj populations that DO apply Sharia Law. Someplaces have attempted to counter this by passing community laws stating NO laws other than those of the Constitution are allowed. Guess what! Mooselims, messkin illegal aliens, and demoncraps FIGHT those America ONLY laws. Most recently, in the Dallas-Fort Worth region of Texas.

  54. Ursula says:

    Islam for a long time has been planning to overtake the rest of the world. The Moores have been thrown out of Spain a long time ago. They want to recapture what they lost and get more. They will do anything for this to happen. We need to fight this. There is a difference between tolerance of religion and letting one religion take over. Personally I feel religion is the downfall of the world. If there was no religion we would have a lot less problems.

    • Vasu Murti says:

      The Moorish Empire stretched from Spain to Indonesia, and is now largely forgotten. In his article “Arab Defamation in the Media,” vegan celebrity Casey Kasem lists well-known Arab Americans, “Like consumer advocate Ralph Nader; heart surgeon, Dr. Michael DeBakey. The founder of MADD — Mothers Against Drunk Driving — Candy Lightner. The football Heisman Trophy winner from Boston College, Doug Flutie; and the race-car winner of the Indy 500 in 9186, Bobby Rahal. Performers like pop stars Paula Abdul and Paul Anka, oractor and Oscar-winner for Amadesus, F. Murray Abraham. Actress Marlo Thomas and her father, Danny Thomas, comedian, humanitarian and founder of St. Jude’s Children’s Hospital. Authors like Khalil Gibran of The Prophet and William Peter Blatty who wrote The Exorcist. Political figures like Senate Majority Leader George Mitchell and White House Chief of Staff John Sununu. And let’s not forget the family of the courageous teacher and astronaut who died aboard the Challenger — Christa McAuliffe.

      “And what about that heritage, that heritage that goes back thousands of years?” asks Kasem. “Let me take a minute to tell you about it. The Arab civilization gave the world a religion, a language, an alphabet — and advances in science and medicine that inspired great European thinkers like Leonardo da Vinci. In astronomy, they used astrolabes navigation, star maps and celestial globes, and the concept of the center of gravity. In geography, they pioneered the use of latitude and longitude. Arabs invented the water clock, and in music, the lute and the guitar.

      “Their architecture inspired the Gothic style in Europe. And in agriculture, they introduced oranges, dates, sugar and cotton, and pioneered sophisticated water works and irrigation systems. Their contributions to medicine were especially outstanding. They developed the first teaching hospitals and traveling medical clinics. They performed the first cesarean section… They diagnosed stomach cancer, measles, smallpox, cholera and bubonic plague — all of this 300 years before Louis Pasteur taught us to destroy harmful bacteria by pasteurization! And this wealth of knowledge and civilization pulled the Europeans out of the Dark Ages when the Arabs came into southern Europe, beginning a Golden Age in Span that lasted for centuries.”

      As an example of bias even in mainstream secular American society, Kasem cites: “…the murder of Alex Odeh in 1985, caused by a pipe bomb planted in his office. He was an Arab American from Palestine, a poet and the local head of a branch of the ADC, the Arab-American Anti-Discrimination Committee.” Kasem notes “the shocking murder of Leon Klinghoffer” received far greater attention. “But Alex Odeh was an American citizen, too, murdered here in America. Is it less a tragedy when an Arab is murdered than when anyone else is murdered?”

      This article originally appeared in The Link, Room 241, 475 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10115, and was reprinted in the October 1992 issue of Harmony: Voices for a Just Future, a peace and justice periodical on the religious left.

      Editor and publisher Rose Evans writes: “Casey Kasem, disc jockey and radio personality of outstanding fame, has long used his position to make the world a kinder, juster, more joyful place. He has been arrested several times for his stands against nuclear weapons and against homelessness in America. As an American of Lebanese Druze parents, he is deeply concerned about anti-Arab prejudice.”

      In his 1994 book, Krishna, Israel and the Druze, Dhira Govinda dasa writes that when Krishna devotees performed harinama (chanting and dancing in praise of God) on the streets of Jerusalem, the orthodox Jews would come out and harass them.

      The Druze, a mystical Arab sect, on the other hand, respond favorably. The Druze believe in reincarnation, and have a concept of their religious leader or sheikh, being similar to a shaktya-avesha-avatar, or an empowered representative of God.

      Dhira Govinda dasa writes that Druze women are allowed to be college-educated, but he also writes (favorably) that they are still chaste and protected, like in the ancient Vedic (also known as Hindu) civilization.

      The ancient eastern reincarnationist religions Hinduism, Buddhism, and Jainism all predate Christianity, all oppose abortion, all teach ahimsa, or nonviolence towards humans and animals alike to the point of vegetarianism, all are vegan-friendly, and all teach that abortion and war are the karma for killing animals, and that therefore, we cannot end abortion nor bring about world peace until first we abolish the killing of animals. From 1992 through 2003, James Dawson, raised Catholic and now a Buddhist, published Live and Let Live, a pro-life / animal rights / libertarian ‘zine.

  55. Ursula says:

    Lets not let this happen here in America. It’s happening in Europe and my native Germany is overrun by so called refugees/terrorists. It has to stop – PERIOD

    • David Taylor says:

      It6 is already happening in America. Think Detroit MI where there are large areas occupied by Isdamic mooselims. There are other such cities with the same type of occupation. There are designated “lanes” in AZ , CA, and some minor “lanes” in some other states that are used by messkin cartels for transporting drugs and illegal “immigrants”.
      POTUS Trump wants to increase the size of the Border Patrol, ICE, and build the wall to cur down on this, BUT demoncraps do NOT want to stop the illegal activity.
      It is beyond my comprehension how ANYONE can conscientously remain a demoncrap. It is my contention that ANYONE who votes demo and supports that party is just as evil, deceitful, croked, arrogant, anti-America, anti-Constitution, anti-Christian, and traitorous as those he/she support. Include ministers, little old church ladies, and members of the so-called ‘greatest generation”.

  56. Merlin Wood says:

    sheria law is a crime in the US

  57. a fool says:

    When the Clintons, the Obamas and all the High Power DNC Members open up their homes and yards for the HOMELESS and the ILLEGL IMMIGRANT, then we will consider…. It is called “Put one’s money where one’s mouth is!” If one can not does what one says when demands others to do it, that person is a HYPOCRITE! A walking DEAD! One’s flesh must lives one’s words. If not, that person is a Walking DEAD! No dead could be held responsible to whose words!

  58. ALAN says:

    My Fellow Americans, I sincerely caution you: Do not get cocky about the Constitution and the rule of law in our great Country. You and I best keep our eyes and ears open. If the DEMON-CRAPS take control of Congress and -God forbid it!- the White House, and the Supreme Court this country, my brothers and sister, is toast. The only laws there will be will be for illegal immigrants and homosexuals and freaks (trannies), Muslims, etc. Keep your eyes open and prepare for a possible civil war. THIS IS NOT FUNNY! MAGA!

  59. ALAN says:

    If Western “Culture” is dumb enough to accept this fecal matter, Western “Culture” should just fold up and go home. Where is home? You assholes will not have one because you gave it away, Duh!

  60. Robert Terry Moore says:

    Sharia Law is antithetical to the values and lifestyle of the American culture. However , Dearborn, Michigan is a good example of what could happen to the USA , as the town has more Muslims than native Americans and Sharia Law is practiced there. That should not be.

    In any case, as has been mentioned above, if any of these people are allowed into this country, then they need to adapt to our culture and if they can’t or won’t then, they need to be deported to their respective country where they can practice their religion, but not here.

    • willard weems says:

      If the people in Dearborn Michigan allowed this to happen, then they will reap what they have sown! If a single person living there does not have the guts/nerve to seek justice thru the courts, (not the ones in Dearborn) to stop the insanity going on, then , sadly, they deserve what they have and get! I served 20 plus ears in the Army to protect and defend our way of life, translated: the Constitution of the U.S. not some other country’s way of life.

      • David Taylor says:

        Willard – millions of American have served after taking the oath to serve and protect the Constitution against all enemies – foreign AND domestic. Including the so-called “greatest generation”. They saved America and the world from servitude some 70+ years ago, but since then have done their damnest to GIVE us over to evil domination. They have violated their oath of allegiance and have thus become traitors. My brother is one of them, and I have severed relations with him for that.

  61. Terre says:

    Wow!!! You go girl! Here’s an awesome person with the intestinal fortitude to do what NEEDS to be done. My hat’s off to her! Keep up the excellent work, Lauren! Australia should be quite ashamed of themselves – embracing such a dark, hopeless religion; & that’s all it is – religion….man made toxic propaganda; it has nothing to do with the Lord God Almighty, righteousness, salvation or anything Godly. It’s worthless & only insures those who follow it a 1 way ticket into hell. What a sad thing, that so many people choose to be blind to the Truth & willingly exchange it for The Lie…..

  62. Dave says:

    I agree with much of what “David” above is trying to say, but his terrible grammar and spelling seriously detract from the message.

    My feelings on bringing the Muslims (or any culture differing from ours) into our country is…”Bring yourselves and your families if you like, but learn OUR way of life, and OUR laws and abide by them. If your culture is so great, STAY THERE!

  63. David says:

    Shari law should not ever be brought to the United States that is the Muslim Radicals type of law if you come to our Country the United States you will Adhear to our LAWS and not Shari Law. You comes get hear to America you will not bring your Crupet Laws HEAR. If you don’t like it go back to your on Country we don’t want you hear. We have enough trouble with our on people braking the LAW we do not want others coming hear and starting TRUBLE. GO HOME TO YOUR ON COUNTRY AND MAkE TRUBLE THEAR AND LET THEM DEAL WITH YOU. You proubley we’ll be thrown in JAIL. HA HA HA

  64. James P Hutchins says:

    F sharia law America has a constitution that is the law of America USA.

    • Nancy Anderson says:

      I agree

    • Deb says:

      I agree. Mooslimers should not ever be allowed to become citizens of our country. True mooslimers will NEVER separate themselves from radical islammism. If one does separate himself from that killer ideology, they will become targets for all other radical mooslimers who will avenge and kill.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: