Former New York Times editor just made a jaw-dropping confession about fake news

The media’s coverage of President Trump is downright disgraceful.

The “main stream media” has become a 24/7 attack dog against Donald Trump and barely even bothers to report the unbiased truth.

Now, one former New York Times editor is speaking out and what she exposed about the fake news media will make your jaw drop.

Since the election, media outlets have shifted to covering Trump almost exclusively.

Now we know why.

Former New York Times editor, Jill Abramson, just admitted that the New York Times no longer engages in real journalism.

Instead, they publish negative news stories about Trump that generate higher website traffic and more revenue.

Breitbart reports:

Jill Abramson, the former executive editor of the far-left New York Times, the same triggered loon who carries an Obama doll in her purse to “comfort” her wounded soul in Trump’s America, is accusing the Times of being a gang of money-hungry hacks who have sold their souls to the anti-Trump Resistance.

Howard Kurtz at Fox News reports that in her upcoming book, Merchants of Truth, Abramson blasts away at her successor, Dean Baquet.

“Though Baquet said publicly he didn’t want the Times to be the opposition party, his news pages were unmistakably anti-Trump,” Abramson writes. “Some headlines contained raw opinion, as did some of the stories that were labeled as news analysis.”

“Given its mostly liberal audience, there was an implicit financial reward for the Times in running lots of Trump stories, almost all of them negative: they drove big traffic numbers and, despite the blip of cancellations after the election, inflated subscription orders to levels no one anticipated,” she writes.

It’s been clear from the start that media outlets such as The New York Times, CNN, and MSNBC hate President Trump.

But this admission shows it’s a win-win for the fake news media.

They get to push their political agenda by attacking Trump constantly.

And they profit off their readers’ hatred of the President.

But the chickens could soon come home to roost.

As they continue to expose their blatant political bias, they could run into trouble with the Federal Elections Commission (FEC) for unreported in-kind contributions in favor of the Democrats.

Do you think the fake news media should be forced to report its coverage as an in-kind donation to the Democrats?

Vote in our poll and let us know your thoughts in the comments section.

You may also like...

%d bloggers like this: