Donald Trump sent an anti-gun Judge scurrying under a rock with this tweet

The Democrats are not satisfied with incremental gun control.

Their loony base is demanding full repeal of the Second Amendment.

One anti-gun Judge called for its full repeal, but Trump shut him down with this one tweet.

Former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens made waves when he wrote a New York Times op-ed calling for the repeal of the Second Amendment.

Stevens wrote:

“Concern that a national standing army might pose a threat to the security of the separate states led to the adoption of that amendment, which provides that “a well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Today that concern is a relic of the 18th century

That simple but dramatic action would move Saturday’s marchers closer to their objective than any other possible reform. It would eliminate the only legal rule that protects sellers of firearms in the United States — unlike every other market in the world. It would make our schoolchildren safer than they have been since 2008 and honor the memories of the many, indeed far too many, victims of recent gun violence.”

Stevens is representing the views of a sizeable potion of the Democrats base.

A recent YouGov poll found 39 percent of Democrats – and 21 percent of all Americans – want to repeal the Second Amendment.

Trump responded via tweet and shut this nonsense down immediately.

You may also like...

76 Responses

  1. Deborah Gillis says:

    not just in Supreme Court but in every court. There are way way too manyliberals making decisions. we do not know these people or how they think.


  3. mmousekiller says:

    NO you wouldn’t… The 2nd is one of our rights and losing it will start an avalanche of loosing the rest of them. That is a dictatorship. Just what obama was shooting for

  4. Tony Rowell says:

    I think if Stevens doesn’t like our constitution, Cuba would welcome him with open arms

  5. Alan says:

    Would the retired justice similarly characterize the First and Fourth Amendments too?

  6. Dewey says:

    He Grampa, do a search on the internet ‘London murder rate vs New York’ look at the BBC article. England has a very strict laws on gun ownership and yet the London’s murder rate is high than New York.

  7. Gramps says:

    Molon Labe, brother

  8. Rivahmitch says:

    All due respect, Grandpa (and I’m one as well), The removal of the 2nd Amendment would n0ot be “litigated in court”, but in the streets. Those who are unwilling to kill an die to protect their rights, freedoms and property will inevitably and deservedly lose them and their offspring will be mere serfs and servants to the new god of government . Semper Fi!!

  9. Cliff says:

    We have another TWO in N.Y. “king andrew” and “king deblasio” And don’t forget mexifornis “king moonbeam”

  10. Grampa says:

    what would repeal do? we would still have our rights. ti would only remove the restrictions on government to make laws that would need to belitigated in court. this would mean government would have expanded powers for many years and could provide the conditions to get people used to not having guns. if many were not so lazy they would find the data on all the countries who have no guns and see how the lawless have expanded their effect on the citizen.

  11. Graywolf12 says:

    Two. One was in England, and the other want to be King Obama.

  12. Graywolf12 says:

    Two kings. One in England and the other Obama.

  13. Graywolf12 says:

    When will the libs just own up to being afraid of guns. They look scary, make a lot of noise, are heavy, and kick the shooter What other reason is needed to institute non sense gun laws.

  14. Gwyllm says:

    We handed a KING his own a$$ over our guns, a few Libtards will be childsplay.

  15. Jim says:

    This is why Supreme Court Justices should be voted on by the people, not placed there as the President deems fit . . . even Congress gets a lop-sided choice to seat! We, the people, need to have a louder voice in who judges us!!!

  16. Jim says:

    This must be the reason why history has been revised in America . . . to show anything other than the truth of what happens to those countries that outlaw guns! Hitler took guns out of the hands of the people . . . Mao Si Tung did the same . . . both of which led to the death of millions and two of the most tyrannical overlords ever seen in the history of the world!!! If the real history was taught to the kids in our schools, America would NEVER be trying to eliminate the 2nd Amendment of the Bill of Rights . . . and they would fully understand the need for “a well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”!!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: