Donald Trump made one demand that could force Ruth Bader Ginsburg off the Supreme Court

Liberal justices on the Supreme Court long ago declared war on President Trump.
But now Trump has had enough and is fighting back.

And Donald Trump made one demand that could force Ruth Bader Ginsburg off the Supreme Court.

Radical left-wing justice Sonya Sotomayor made news when she outrageously called out the court’s five conservative justices for acting like political partisans.

Donald Trump decided two could play at that game and ripped Sotomayor and Ginsburg for being politically biased against him and demanded they recuse themselves from cases involving his administration.

The President has a strong case that Justice Ginsburg should have recused herself from day one after Trump took the Oval Office.

During the 2016 campaign, Ginsburg took the unprecedented step of criticizing candidate Trump.

“I can’t imagine what this place would be — I can’t imagine what the country would be — with Donald Trump as our president,” she said. “For the country, it could be four years. For the court, it could be — I don’t even want to contemplate that,” Ginsburg told The New York Times in an interview.

“Now it’s time for us to move to New Zealand,” Ginsburg added.

Never before had a sitting Supreme Court Justice inserted themselves into the Presidential campaign by taking sides against a candidate.

Ginsburg’s comments were so far over the line that even the liberal Amazon-owned Washington Post editorial board blasted Ginsburg’s comments as “inappropriate.”

In a Russian collusion case, Democrats accused the President of being in league with Moscow when it was really Hillary Clinton’s campaign conspiring with foreign spies.

And in this instance, liberals like Sotomayor are the ones guilty of the charges they throw at conservatives.

You may also like...

46 Responses

  1. Jerry B Robison says:

    The liberals on the supreme court cannot be trusted to be politically unbiased anymore than any other liberal, secular-progressive democrat.

  2. Sharon Jenkins says:

    Justices are to adhere to the US Constitution, evidence presented and put biases aside.

  3. Liberal says:

    Luckily, Drumpf has NO POWER over Justices already on the Supreme Court!

  4. Daniel Flores says:

    Really, as a United States Citizen in his late fifties, I expect two things from SCOTUS and that is to be impartial and open-minded when they decide a case that affects so many in this country. When you start seeing individual justices as political hacks one way or the other, you really lose confidence in the court as a whole. I understand that every Justice has a belief, but when they use their presumed impartiality influence to steer ordinary citizens in one a direction politically that may not have that same opinion, it makes any decision they make start to look like simple politics rather than a sound, impartial and constitutionally based decision. I would hate to see the reputation of SCOTUS sink to the level of simple career politicians who have the same reputation as the profit-minded corrupt media. Very sad state of affairs to say the least.

  5. CrawfishFestival says:

    Excellent insight, “Irritable Bill”. TY for speaking up.

  6. Irritable Bill says:

    WTF? We don’t want that hideous crone in New Zealand or Australia…or even in the Southern Hemisphere, keep your human crap please, we have enough of our own.
    By the way, the reason the sociopathic left keep saying they will move to NZ is because after the Christchurch earthquake disaster, well funded wankers from Hollyweird etc moved in and bought up real estate cheap while the country was in financial shock….you can have that vermin back anytime you want too. They bring you great discredit guys, they are doing it all round the world. Not cool.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: