CNN’s Interview about Kavanaugh’s Accuser took a turn no one saw coming

CNN allows Michael Avenatti to appear on their air at a moment’s notice.

He could not wait to appear on air to push his latest accusations against Brett Kavanaugh.

But this interview took a crazy turn that no one saw coming.

Avenatti appeared on CNN’s New Day.

He figured he was in for a softball interview.

Avenatti released a declaration from Julie Swetnick claiming she attended ten parties where Brett Kavanaugh helped get girls drunk so they could be gang raped.

But the allegations quickly fell apart.

CNN’s Alyson Camerota pressed Avenatti on the outrageous nature of his allegations.

Newsbusters reports:

“The claims your client makes are jaw dropping, and some of them frankly strain credulity. They don’t make sense to me,” Camerota bluntly put it, asking the lawyer to explain to their audience why his client would continue to attend parties where alleged drunken groping and gang raping was going on:

“How is any of this possible? How is it possible that if she saw any of these things she would continue to go to house parties like this?” Camerota asked the obvious question. Avenatti bristled at being actually asked a real question for once.

“Well first of all, my client is 100 percent credible!” he snarled. Avenatti claimed he wanted an FBI investigation into Swetnick’s story, and he had offered the Senate committee to question his client in a committee hearing.
But Camerota pressed Avenatti again to answer her question. “Just to my question, why would she ever go back? Why did she go to ten of those house parties?” she asked.

Americans can see the basic unfairness of the situation.

A publicity hound like Avenatti is using ridiculous allegations against Brett Kavanaugh to boost his profile ahead of the 2020 Presidential campaign.

The allegations he put forth were so wild that the New York Times reported they cannot corroborate them.

Loading...

You may also like...

140 Responses

  1. M says:

    Michael, I understand he may run for President and I so hope he does. Will be the easiest victory for the GOP ever! The Dems have a huge criminal element problem in their candidates already and Avenatti would be a bridge too far! Talk about voters staying home, YES! I can’t believe they would seriously support him, as the old saying goes, for dogcatcher! He will probably be disbarred at some point, hopefully sooner rather than later, and will sneak away never to be seen or heard from again. Unless, he is arrested for pimping for his former clients.

  2. Susie says:

    Next time I’ll use my stylus so a ghost won’t keep changing my words!!!

  3. Susie says:

    A pay off to the lawyer. I was it too. SJL was looking all.around her then whipped out the envelope and quickly handed it to lawyer standing up sort of behind ford and very quickly stuffing the #10 environment into the right side of his sportcoat…hen glancing around as if to see if anyone saw him do it. Maybe we should report that. Was Sheila Jackson Lee using taxpayer $ ? I believe that would be illegal!

  4. Michael says:

    I think Mr. Avenatti is a perfect candidate for the democrat party in 2020.

  5. dale says:

    I really like that, call it accountability to reduce or eliminate agenda driven accusations and hold people accountable for fraud and lies.

  6. Frankie p Gatturna says:

    You Sir are a true american ! Iwish You were a congressman. For some reason those in power are afraid to act. There is so much corruption everyone is afraid to take a stance. It makes me sick. We ought to put them all on alcatraz. And let them rule the rock.

  7. Frankie p Gatturna says:

    You Sir are a true american ! Iwish You were a congressman. For some reason those in power are afraid to act. There is so much corruption everyone is afraid to take a stance. It makes me sick. We ought to put them all on alcatraz. And let them rule the rock.

  8. Robert Higginbotham says:

    The legal profession, namely lawyers, have a very bad, sometime despicable reputation thanks to trash like Avenatti. There are too many lawyers to start just watch all the ambulance chasers advertising on TV. Crumbs such as Avenatti make their reputation even worse.

  9. LBB says:

    We need a new rule/law. If someone is accused publicly and cannot prove the accusation then the accused must be reimbursed by the accuser or the accuser must go to jail for at least one year depending on the gravity of the accusation and the damage done because of the accusation that is not proven. I be people will think twice before making accusations that are unfounded or even imagined.

  10. Sue Jackson says:

    Congress’s own Shelia Jackson Lee, aka never losses an opportunity to brow beat a white man and sometimes even a white woman in order to suit my racist agenda, was seen passing the male attorney of Christine Blasey Ford a thick envelope at the end of the day on Thursday. Wonder what was in the envelope? Maybe it was her resume or maybe her confession about how she was raped by judge Kavanaugh, or President Trump or maybe Lindsey Graham. Who knows what might come from a Democrats mouth since they know only how to lie and speak evil of any who do not bow at their feet.

  11. dale says:

    When you tell something that did not occur or you were too drunk or drugged to remember past fuzzy then credibility goes down fast. Many have reported that were raped remembered details to the details so real that it was if it were happening.

    If you are not drugged or drunk while in a car accident, the mind normally can remember the most minute detail of the accident itself. Sometimes the shock is so great that, in order to protect oneself from the trauma, a coma or memory blank out occurs. The data is so hidden only hypnosis can reveal the details.

    Ford had a questionable polygraph test if not used properly or falsely gives false results. Who gave it and how professional was the tester and was the tester testing the right info? Also was the tester paid off? All about the test was fuzzy also. Some details should be known. I would like to have hypnosis run on the lady – if she is lying she will reveal truth and details of what happened if she has a memory block. Hypnosis is dangerous and only professionals can do it because it taps the eternal spiritual mind of the person that never loses the info stored. One can tell the date and accurately tell all details. Such a test would give all the details to indict Kavanaugh if he was guilty or indict her for lying or placing Kavanaugh as the attacker when he was not and revealing who did IF such a rape occurred.

    Personally I really doubt she was raped and if she was she was so out of it to remember hardly anything let alone details on who and what happened while drugged or drunk.

    Personally I really feel that the whole thing was made up or exaggerated to the ninth degree.

  12. N says:

    We learned that Ford cannot remember:
    – Time/date/location of party
    – Who drove her to party
    – Who was at party
    – Who pushed her into room
    – Who drove her from party
    – Date/who paid for her polygraph
    – Grandmother’s funeral date?
    But “100% sure” it was Kavanaugh 36 yrs ago!

  13. marshmil1789 says:

    There has been NO proof it was Brett Kavanaugh. The only reason he is pointed out is that he’s a constitutional conservative up for a lifetime appointment to the US Supreme Court. Had Rahm Emanuel, Bill Clinton or Ted Kennedy been up for this confirmation they would have been confirmed in a matter of minutes.

  14. Randy Burke says:

    I think this should all be forgotten,when I was in high school it was just a game to see how many panties we could get into & the girls were just as bad as the guys,the more they please the more popular they were this also goes back to when my parents were in school,games will never change

  15. Randy Burke says:

    I think thi should all be forgotten,when I was in high school it was just a game to see how many panties we could get into & the girls were just as bad as the guys,the more they please the more popular they were,this also goes back to when my parents were in school,games will never change

  16. shelly says:

    I agree.

  17. Rxtek says:

    Ok, whatever

  18. Rxtek says:

    Trump had nothing to do with any of this. Smokin crack?

  19. Rxtek says:

    I agree, but the proper term is recalled and that should be secured by their constituents.

  20. Inkpad says:

    lol California is probably paying him remember California hates trump and love illegal immigrants that’s big money for California

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: