A judge said one thing to William Barr that put a huge smile on Nancy Pelosi’s face

Attorney General William Barr is one of the Left’s biggest villains.

They despise him because he was appointed by President Trump.

And now a judge said one thing to William Barr that put a huge smile on Nancy Pelosi’s face.

Following the release of Robert Mueller’s report proving Trump didn’t collude with Russia, one would hope America would come together.

But Democrats are furious that their two-year investigation came out as a win for the president, and the country as a whole.

And they are demanding more from the Justice Department, trying to order Barr to turn over the report, without redactions.

Barr has so far refused their demands, considering it would be illegal to follow through.

But now a federal judge in Washington, D.C. is on the side of the Democrats, pressing Justice Department lawyers on why they won’t release the entire report, and criticizing Barr on his handling of the report.

The Hill reports:

A federal judge in Washington, D.C., on Monday pressed Department of Justice (DOJ) lawyers on why the public shouldn’t be allowed to see redacted portions of former special counsel Robert Mueller’s report, suggesting that he may be willing to consider releasing at least some of the restricted document.

Judge Reggie Walton, an appointee of former President George W. Bush, posed the questions during a hearing on a pair of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits seeking the redacted portions of the report.

The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) and BuzzFeed News reporter Jason Leopold filed the lawsuits earlier this year. The cases have since been consolidated, and attorneys for each party split the arguments during Monday’s hearing.

Walton in particular raised concerns about Attorney General William Barr’s initial handling of Mueller’s report, indicating that he believed there were discrepancies in how Barr characterized the report and the former special counsel’s actual findings.

These are some of the same redactions Nancy Pelosi and the Democrat Party have been demanding from Barr’s Justice Department.

But Pelosi instead was trying to gain the entire report, without any redactions.

Doing so would be illegal, so naturally Barr refused to comply.

And in turn, Democrats in the House voted to hold in him contempt of Congress.

Needless to say, Pelosi will hold this as a solid win, to claim that she was correct in her erroneous vote to hold Barr in contempt of Congress.

You may also like...

53 Responses

  1. D.A.N. says:

    If you don’t have contempt for the House at least, you must be a Democrat.

  2. Grampa says:

    So he will be in contempt of congress well he will be in good company with millions of other Americans who hold congress in contempt.———Grampa

  3. Mary says:

    I’m waiting for the Dems to demand, get courts involved and after all that Barr releases the whole report and it will be embarrassing to Dems. These Democrats keep thinking it will incriminate Trump, but I think and hope it backfires on them.

  4. Mary says:

    I’m waiting for the Dems to demand, get courts involved and after all that Barr releases the whole report and it will be embarrassing to Dems. These Democrats keep thinking it will incriminate Trump, but I think and hope it backfires on them.

  5. Jeff Beard says:

    No Jenny, Buddy is not an ignorant idiot, he’s an AS*HO*LE…..

  6. Jeff Beard says:

    It won’t happen because the people that vote for those scumbags are as stupid and pathetic as they are !!!

  7. Candice says:

    They want what they want when they want it. Very demanding people. Always expecting but never giving. Yes, I’m referring to the Democrats!

  8. Marlin450 says:

    Damn that’s funny

  9. Raffa says:

    What about if was a Baptist would the same apply,I am a Catholic and the Baptists and a lot of your major denominations have the same beliefs as Catholics. But the main reason what does any religion have to do with a appointment for any office. Sen. Hirono and Harris speak like two assholes on the same roll of toilet paper.

  10. PatriotSoul says:

    DEMONazis should be barred from holding public office or judicial seats in any court because they would allow their liberal ideology to affect their votes and decisions. Kamala Harris, Dianne Feinstein and Mazie Hirono said that about Catholics: “In September 2017, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., suggested Judge Amy Coney Barrett is too Catholic to serve on the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals.

    More than a year later, Sen. Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, and Kamala Harris, D-Calif., have renewed Feinstein’s line of attack, suggesting this month that attorney Brian Buescher may also be unfit to serve as a federal judge on account of his Catholic faith. The only difference between now and September 2017 is that Hirono and Harris are not so explicit in their bigotry.”

  11. larry says:

    judge Walton is a CROOKED LIBERAL

  12. Dorothy says:

    That can’t happen soon enough!

  13. chief1937 says:

    Mike I would be careful I believe your statement is slander and you could face consequences for it. That is unless you can prove it is true.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: